Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the MSM bias category.

Bypassing the dinosaur

Don’t miss Prime Minister Stephen Harper live on YouTube at 10:45 Eastern this morning! He will be discussing the recent  Throne Speech and budget (that  just passed with a little help from his Liberal friends.)

You are also invited to submit questions for a YouTube interview on Tuesday evening (7 pm EST).  This format has been recently used by President Obama.

Going straight to the people without the biased MSM filter. Who knew we were that smart to be able to interpret things for ourselves?

*   *   *   *

*   *   *   *

Better version here on the Prime Minister’s own YouTube channel.

You can’t have it both ways (but they still try)

Lorrie Goldstein presents a compelling argument to global warming alarmists in today’s column Global Warming Snow Job -  not that logic was ever their strong suit (or objective science for that matter):

...So, given the somewhat unsurprising news Olympic officials were trucking in snow to Cypress Mountain, site of the freestyle skiing and snowboard events, how did Canadian warmists respond?

Well, here’s our most famous environmentalist, David Suzuki, calmly commenting.

“I’ve watched in horror as the snow just melted away from Cypress Mountain and it’s even more horrifying to me to think of helicopters airlifting snow from Manning Park to fill it back up again.”

In addition to Suzuki’s apparently low tolerance for horror, climatically speaking, his foundation chimed in man-made global warming clearly had a hand in the lack of snow.

So, just to review the warmist perspective:

(1) North of the 49th parallel — global warming explains the lack of snow.

(2) South of the 49th parallel — global warming explains the snow.

Plus:

(1) Warmists can use single weather events to prove global warming.

(2) Opponents can’t use single weather events to disprove global warming.

Does it not occur to warmists that stuff like this is one of the reasons more and more people are starting to think of them as the intellectual heirs of Chicken Little?

And a few words for the Gore-Suzuki bootlicking media:

As for Canada’s warmist media, if you’re wondering why fewer people are buying your argument neither climategate nor the growing scientific controversies engulfing the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is news, ask yourself this.

How many of you (justifiably) criticized Inhofe, DeMint and Fox for what they said? Now, how many of you criticized Suzuki and his foundation for what they said? Oops.

A final assignment for warmists. Go to your video bible, Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, and find in all those dramatic visual images linking global warming to present-day heat waves, droughts, floods, melting glaciers, rising sea levels and hurricanes, one image — just one — linking global warming to record snowstorms.

Trust me, you won’t find any, because that would have gotten in the way of Gore’s painfully simplistic argument that more greenhouse gas emissions simply means more heat...

Unfortunately for the Warming lobby, the public is becoming more educated and less likely to placidly accept the Green Koolaid that’s been shoved down our throats for so long.  And what many of us would like to see is some kind of redress for this massive propaganda scheme which seems to have been preying on our blind faith and naivete – and costing us big bucks.

At the very least let’s hope we have learned to view the news with a dose of healthy skeptism – and not be afraid of being labelled a ‘denier’.

The debate is NOT over

Yesterday saw two huge news stories but you’ll only hear one from most of Canadian MSM.  And make no mistake.  Alexandre Bilodeau’s historic Olympic achievement is certainly worth celebrating.

But another major event may be in danger of slipping under the radar unless we force it to the forefront -  Professor Phil Jones is now backtracking on previously-held dogma about global warming and climate change. One wonders what fellow High Priest Al Gore is thinking right now.   In fact, where is he? Hiding in a snow drift somewhere on the east coast?

In any case, Tim Ball was on the Roy Green show yesterday for a brief chat on the significance of all this [click on Sunday Feb. 14 at 2 pm and fastforward to the last 10 minutes].  Roy asked Tim if ‘this thing is totally unraveling right now?’ and Tim answered ‘completely’ and the question is now ‘how long is it going to take for the politicians to realize it?’ They both agreed that the pols would be ‘breaking their ankles jumping off the bandwagon’, but they have a problem having already committed so much money to it.

Tim Ball reiterated that opinion in his column in CFP – IPCC Corruption Included Ignoring Facts and Science:

Watch the Richter Scale as Politicians Jump Off the IPCC Wagon

Jones only concedes some points but they are enough from the high priest of the CRU and IPCC to completely destroy its credibility. What will the sycophants and exploiters like Gore and the Mainstream Media do now? What about politicians who based positions and policy on environment and energy on the IPCC? What about the massive scams of Cap And Trade? What about the extreme environmental groups who have bullied and preached from the moral high ground? What about the scientists who took vehement positions without understanding? It is a very sad day for science, the people and the world.

Well I hope that politicians wake up but I fear they’ll only do the right thing once the public is made aware of the inconsistencies and contradictions. And that will only happen once the media decides to cover the stories or if ordinary citizens start taking up the fight for truth.

As Adrian MacNair brilliantly pointed out, the pols are only going to do what’s popular:

…Don’t expect our politicians to drop everything either. “Conservative” Environment Minister Jim Prentice is still sending Canada’s industry on a suicide pact with the United States’ own Obamachange legislation, and the province of British Columbia still has a carbon tax on fuel that isn’t making the unemployment rate any better right now. They don’t care. They still believe utterly that the public believes utterly in the science behind boiling pots of frogs and hockey stick graphs.

You can’t really blame them. They’re politicians. If Canadians believed that the world faced the grave danger of alien abduction and medical probing, you can bet the government would install some kind of alien-abduction and probing prophylaxis system that would make us feel better. Just like we do when we strip for the peek-a-boo cameras at the airport…

Meanwhile, expect to see some media outlets continue to stick tenaciously to the old party line until media consumers and ordinary citizens start demanding the truth.

*   *   *   *

Update:

Al Gore sticks his nose out of the ground – Al Gore sticks to his guns, says ‘climate crisis is unfolding before our eyes’Washington Times

Is Global Warming Dead?Blake D. Dvorak at Chicago Now:

All of which leads the Post’s Dana Milbank, no friend of conservatives or Republicans, to write in his column that all that talk about more frequent and worse hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts because of global warming was about as scientifically valid as the recent babble that record-breaking snow storms in DC disprove global warming. “Argument-by-anecdote isn’t working,” he says. Only too true and it’s about time someone not on the right had the courage to say it.

But Milbank takes his column further. Noting recent revelations and contradictions in the science, he writes: “The science is overwhelming — but not definitive.” There was a time when such blasphemy would earn Milbank the title of “denier.” But that time is swiftly passing and there’s beginning to be a general retreat from the global warming crowd on all the doomsday scenarios and “we have X number of years to save Earth” talk. Milbank notes that even Al Gore’s outfit is switching from TV ads about climate change to the importance of green energy

*   *   *   *

Tuesday Update

Lots of great links out there. Too many to keep up with really.

Follow the money: BBC exposed in biggest climate racket on planet – Climategate

IPCC scaremongering is destroying its credibility
Bjorn Lomborg

Less horror and Gore, more honest debate Paul Schneidereit, Chronicle Herald

And this is a blockbuster of a column – Climate: Politics of fear by Chris Vander Doelen of the Windsor Star:

To me, the most important lesson to be learned from climate change and its believers isn’t about the environment at all. It’s about mob behaviour and the politics of fear.

The global warming cult came so close to taking over the free world because it mixed the fear-mongering and moral superiority of old-time religion with the central control of classic Marxism.

The brilliant mix of do-gooderism and totalitarianism explains why those huddling under the climate umbrella are an unlikely coalition of church ladies, the well-meaning, union hardliners and college-age anarchists.

The people who pushed global warming didn’t want to save the planet — they wanted to enslave it through taxation.

The money — trillions of dollars — would have been redistributed by shadowy forces at the United Nations to those with favoured political systems. Capitalism, of course, would have been dead in a matter of decades. Liberty would have disappeared along with free markets

Dalton McGuinty to prorogue Ontario Legislature

Cue the outrage!!

Where are those Facebook groups? How about the rallies?

I’m looking forward to reading the endless editorials taking Dalton to task.

Yeah right.

*   *   *   *

Update

McGuinty Prorogues. Media strangely silent. – Alberta Ardvark

Ah yes. Prorogation outrage is so – - -  yesterday.

*   *   *   *

Wednesday Update

McGuinty prorogues legislature – Citizen:

Last week, McGuinty suggested the criticism Harper has received over prorogation prompted him to think carefully about any such decision on his part.

“I think it’s kind of lent it a different complexion,” he said. “Prorogation has been an important and respected parliamentary tool for centuries. But it’s important that you don’t abuse that.”

And of course the word ‘abuse’ is in the eye of the observer. Liberals never ‘abuse’ anything. Right?

Liberals good. Conservatives bad.  Right, MSM???

Proroguing under the radarAdam Radwanski:

But mostly, it will allow Mr. McGuinty to get that Throne Speech off his chest.

He could have done that next week by proroguing the legislature now. But the Liberals say they want the speech to get lots of attention, and don’t think that will be possible until the Olympics and the federal budget are over and done with

Oh gee. I thought it was because he was so honourable and everything.  Who knew it was all about strategy?

And Sandy just put up a great post – McGuinty Liberal gov’t prorogation different?

The Opps blew it

Whether it be prorogation or Senate seat-filling, the right of a Prime Minister to exercise those powers is apparently only acceptable in Liberal Governments.

Facebook groups, rallies and related media attention consumed much of January, but now the focus is shifting from the so-called public outrage to the more arcane discussion of somehow limiting the powers of a Prime Minister. Will public interest continue to follow?

Will we start seeing massive demonstrations supporting complicated proposals on whether to make changes to the constitution or put forward a motion to change Standing Orders and the relative efficacy  of either choice?

Somehow I doubt it.

Personally I think this effort of the opposition parties to take the discussion away from the realm of emotion and into such intricate Parliamentary rules that only experts could hope to understand, is going to cause the anti-perogy movement to lose steam and may even serve to underscore this particular prorogation as being entirely constitutional and therefore legitimate – which it is.

What the Opps really want to do is hamstring the power of the Prime Minister’s office. I’m sure Gilles Duceppe will be all for that, and probably Jack too.

But how will the Liberals dance with their coalition partners without reigning in their own power when they inevitably return to form government in the (hopefully distant) future?

Meanwhile I don’t see the public being terribly engaged.

*   *   *   *

Update:

Liberals, NDP ‘testing the ground’ on joint anti-prorogation legislation – Jane Taber

If the Liberals thought it was wrong to prorogue they should fight an election – Shotgun

*   *   *   *

Tuesday Update

Relax Dalton….It’s only a bad thing…Neo at Halls of M.

Canadian Press: Prorogation “not unusual” when Liberals do it
Craig at Canadian Conservatives

Does Michael Ignatieff really want this constitutional dance?Norman Spector

Hey Norman, you stole my metaphor!

Where exactly does the PM stand on AGW?

I think Springer’s really nailed the conundrum that PM Stephen Harper finds himself in right now concerning Anthropogenic (man made) global warming.

If we are perfectly honest here,  many of us at BLY are finding the Prime Minister’s stance on climate change and global warming somewhat disconcerting – especially in light of recent events that are increasingly calling the scientific credibility into question.

Neil D made an interesting observation in the previous post and I think it reflects the opinion of many Conservative supporters:

This is the problem I’m having… we all know he doesn’t believe the planet is warming, he’s called it a wealth-transfer scam in the past, yet he continues on like he does believe although not whole-heartedly leaving himself open to all kinds of criticisms from so many different people. I know he’s not being totally honest and you know he’s not being totally honest and he knows he’s not being totally honest but what I’m personally looking for in a leader, and especially in the Prime Minister of Canada,is someone who IS honest! Someone willing to call a spade a spade and then deal with the fallout.


Do you really think the Libs, Dippers and Greens (or the Bloc) will think any less of him?
He doesn’t have to come out and say that global warming is a scam but the very least he could do is question the science and ask for a full debate. That’s not too much to ask for.

But as Springer and Hunter point out, trying to find a middle, rational ground is difficult for PM Harper in a media environment where even the faintest suspicion of skepticism is cause for a tarring and feathering by CTV, CBC and the opposition leaders.

But wouldn’t we respect a leader more who follows the actual science and responds accordingly, rather than trying to appease the propagandists simply because the majority of Canadians seem to have swallowed the Green Koolaid without an ounce of healthy skepticism?

*   *   *   *

Update:

The federal environment policy is made in Canada, not WashingtonJim Prentice

Swiss jets form wingtip ‘honour guard’ to escort Harper plane out of airspace – Canadian Press (H/T Sammy):

Security and media on board the PM’s plane were initially shocked by the sudden appearance of fighter jets, but were eventually assured that there was no threat to anyone’s safety.

Rather, it was an “honour guard” sent to escort the prime minister out of Swiss air space, a Harper spokesman explained.

The honour guard escort is rarely deployed, and is considered a heartfelt sign of close ties between Switzerland and Canada, the spokesman said...

*   *   *   *

Saturday Update:

The folks predicting climate change apocalypse seem to have fallen curiously muteRex Murphy, National Post:

...No one’s really talking about the failure of Copenhagen now because the ostensible threat to humanity was shown to be shrouded in hype. Al Gore and his crew simply don’t have now what we used to call “the face” to deliver another grand and imperiously moralizing lecture to the world and its carbon-consuming innocents after the travesty revealed in Climategate and the clutter of revelations that followed it.

Keeping Canadian students in the dark on climateLawrence Solomon, Financial Post:

At our high schools, climate change is taught as dogma, with Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth, a staple (in the U.K., after a high-profile case before the High Court found that An Inconvenient Truth is an error-filled work of propaganda, Gore’s film can no longer be presented as scientifically valid). At our universities, no school dares encourage debate on global warming among its faculty, for fear of repercussions in research funding. By the time students have gone through high school and experienced a year or two of Canadian university, as would have been the case with many in the Munk audience, they almost surely would never have been exposed to the scientific controversy over climate change by their schools, except dismissively. One recent graduate of an Ontario university whom I know, who only discovered the controversy over climate change after receiving her master’s in environmental engineering, feels outrage at being kept in the dark by her school in the area she chose for her career

And the following are really good links that I don’t have time to follow up on at the moment. Perhaps another blogger or columnist will and then leave a note to that effect? Thanks.

U.N.’s Global Warming Report Under Fresh Attack for Rainforest ClaimsFox News

(Related: The corruption of science – EU Referendum)

Lots more at NewsWatchCanada.

Climate chief was told of false glacier claims before Copenhagen – Times Online

Uh Oh – Pachauri caught out in IPCC 2035 glacier melt issue – Watts up With That

Harper must go!CJunk.   Well I think that’s a tad harsh!

Polling questions we’ll never see

In this morning’s Globe column Passion over prorogation, Roy MacGregor refers to a recent push poll where one pollster ‘calls up Canadians and suggests that “suspending Parliament is anti-democratic” – essentially baiting respondents.’

Well to be fair another choice was offered by EKOS (”…Stephen Harper can consult directly with Canadians in preparation for the next federal budget), but that anti-democratic word really stands out – even if it is somewhat disingenuous.

I must have missed the news the day Stephen Harper also took away our right to vote in the next election.

In any case here are some questions that I challenge any Canadian polling company to include in their next survey:

In view of the fact that Bob Rae had prorogued Parliament the Ontario Provincial Legislature three times, Jean Chretien prorogued Parliament four times, and PierreTrudeau eleven times, do you see Stephen Harper’s second prorogation as (a) a particular abuse of power or (b) the use of a legitimate constitutional tool?

====

If the former, are you (a) genuinely upset, or (b) simply a Harper-hater and this is a convenient method to bash him along with your anti-conservative cronies?

====

If the former, are you aware that Jean Chretien used prorogation in 2003 as a first step “in a process that ended in him avoiding any blame for the sponsorship program”?

====

Does that bother you too?

====

Or is it just a problem when a Conservative PM does it?

*   *   *   *

Update

Another great polling question would be to preface the prorogation debate with a simple explanation about the unelected Liberal Senate’s abuse of power and how they were able to defy the will of the people up until this moment in time.

Related:

Once again Mr. Iffy has waffled.

Prorogation if necessary but not necessarily prorogation, I guess.

*   *   *   *

Please check out a great column by Arthur Weinreb at CFPHow hard does Parliament actually “work”?

So if the opposition and those who are protesting the prorogation of Parliament are willing to equate the non-sitting of the House of Commons as not working and as a denial of democracy, fine. But we expect them to raise their voices in protest in the future when Parliament extends a day’s holiday to a week and when they take long Christmas and summer holidays. What about global warming? How can MPs take weeks off when the planet is dying? But of course they won’t complain; neither will anyone else. They really don’t care how often the House of Commons sits; they only care about getting Stephen Harper. And that’s really what it is really all about.

*   *   *   *

Other pertinent articles:

Mr. Ignatieff’s game – Norman Spector

Michael Ignatieff Cribs Off Layton Anti-Prorogue Bill
- Adrian MacNair

The Prorogue Score – Harper is an amateur – Just Right

Darcy Meyers: Ignatieff proposals are pleasant but largely pointlessFull Comment (I highly recommend this one!)

*   *   *   *

Tuesday Update:

Reckless media coverage – John Martin, Times

Why a third Globe prorogation editorial failsNorman Spector:

How exactly would Canada and Canadians have been better off if we had been governed through the worst recession in 26 years by a Liberal-NDP coalition supported by the Bloc – a party that, whatever term you use, is dedicated to breaking up one of the most peaceful and prosperous countries on the face of the earth

G8 agenda: Focus on human welfareStephen Harper

Popup ProrogueStephen Taylor


Wednesday Update

Great column by Adam DaifallahThe Tories need a cavalry.

We at BLY support PM Stephen Harper!

With the liberal media providing lots of free publicity and information for tomorrow’s apparently massive anti-prorogue demonstrations and rallies, perhaps it is an appropriate time to reflect on where this is all going.

Let’s assume that the population is indeed upset enough about this particular use of prorogation and believes it has everything to do with a few Afghan detainees being knocked around with dirty shoes by their countrymen.

Let’s then assume that Canadian voters are ticked off enough to do something about it at the ballot box. When would that election occur? Michael Ignatieff says Canadians don’t want an election and he apparently knows everything so what is the public assuming is going to happen after Saturday? What exactly is their hidden agenda?

Do the Anti-Perogies expect the PM to change his mind? Do they anticipate that the GG might rescind her decision to allow the prorogation?

And when the next election does eventually roll around, who are they going to vote for? Mr. Iffy, the man with ‘Big Ideas’ who likes to keep them all to himself? The man who loves platitudes? The man who doesn’t want to let go of the power of prorogation himself?

…He encouraged anti-prorogation organizers in a Facebook posting this week, and confirmed he will be attending Saturday’s protest in Ottawa, but refuses to back Jack Layton’s call for legislation limiting future use of prorogation. When asked to define his political values, he paused then replied: “I’m passionate about freedom.” So was George W. Bush…

And that was by Susan Riley who is hardly a Conservative cheerleader!

Meanwhile, let’s join Conservative Reporter in support of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He may not be perfect but he’s strong and capable – which is not something that can be said of any of the other leaders, IMHO.

*   *   *   *

Personal Note:

I am going to take the weekend off to give my wrist and shoulder a much-needed break.

Comments will be moderated and I will check in periodically. Thanks for your understanding.

*   *   *   *

Update

Terrific post by Alberta ArdvarkProrogation Day.  This is a must-read!

Canada in Haiti: doing the right thing wellDan Leger

Dear Young Liberals

Peter Donolo is trying to do a makeover of your party. It’s about being a grown-up now.

No more ‘frat house’.  Now folks will be required to dress up in ‘professional’ clothing and address Iffy as ‘Mr. Ignatieff’. No more casual atmosphere like at a cool high-tech place.

And there will be no more talk about marijuana from Mr. Rebagliati. In fact, he will not be allowed to talk at all.

All you need to know is Mr. Ignatieff’s views on the subject –    “…I have to say to people who then ask me if I want to legalize marijuana, and I know you don’t want to hear me say this, but I’d say no.”

That’s grown-up talk, kids.

Yes, your party is starting to sound very disciplined and controlled. Very adult.

In fact I could almost start liking your party now with your new leader, Mr. Donolo and all.

Makes me think of … oh, I don’t know,  maybe that control freak guy?

*   *   *   *

Update

Featured comment by Exiled Maritimer:

“Finally!!!!

A Liberal Policy”

*   *   *   *

Wednesday Update:

From comments at the Globe by JimB2 on 1/20/2010 at 5:56:22 AM:

To paraphrase GB Shaw: if you’re not a socialist before age twenty you have no heart; if you’re still a socialist after age forty you have no brain.

Your problem Mr Simpson, is the Canadian population is getting older.

Actually I think it’s the Liberal Party that’s getting older – but not wiser.

Loose lips sink Grits?

The Liberal Party of Canada has a problem. They want the Afghan Detainee controversy to stick to the Harper Government without implicating the military, but the thin veneer of their strategy is starting to wear thin.  Perhaps that is because you can’t do one without the other.

Latest example is John McCallum’s blundering on CBC (H/T Mary T[And don't you just love how Suhana throws him a lifeline?]

Hunter, Ardvark and BC Blue, Dr. Roy have the story well covered, and Ezra Levant just put up a barn burner of a post – The Liberal smear campaign against our troops, aided by the media.

Rather than ignoring the issue, Ezra Levant suggests that the Conservative Party should meet it head-on and force the Liberals to say where they really stand:

There is no need for the Conservatives to run and hide from the detainee issue. Let the country watch Ignatieff make a name for himself, on the backs of Canadian troops both dead and alive. Give the Liberals and the NDP and the Bloc all the goddamned rope they want on this one. Let them stretch their legs a bit. We’ve heard “Abu Ghraib”; who will be the first to make a Nazi comparison? Kinsella? Dosanjh? That sounds more like something Mark Holland might do. Let ‘er rip.

And while Ignatieff basks in the applause of the press gallery and his Facebook friends, let the rest of the country — severely normal Canadians, Canadians who might actually know a soldier, or a soldier’s family — watch in disgust

Monte Solberg says the government believes that it’s a waste of time and money and a bizarre witch hunt of the very ministers and bureaucrats who, seeing deficiencies in the old prisoner transfer system, strengthened it. Whatever might have happened in an isolated case, the Conservatives argue that they dramatically improved the inadequate system inherited from the Liberals.”

But this issue is just going to fester until we deal with it and smoke the Liberals out of their self-righteous foxholes.

Let’s have at it.

*   *   *   *

Sidenote:

Sometime today we should be hitting the one million mark on the Statcounter here at BLY (since April 2008).  Thanks to everyone who is helping to make that happen!

(You too, trolls.)

*   *   *   *

UpdateMore outrage:

Liberals alleging war crimes defaming militaryJust Politics

So, let’s talk about a ‘coverup’Nexus

Senior Liberal: CF “may have been committing war crimes”The Torch

Terry Glavin: Cover-up. What are the Liberals hiding?National Post. (Comments are worth checking out too)

Adrian MacNair: Inquiry must get to bottom of Liberal involvement in war crimes - Full Comment

Frmgrl asks an important question: Media where are you?Chasing Apple Pie

More from The Torch - Maybe some former Liberal ministers should be worrying about their asses.

Great post at Chasing Apple Pie regarding this National Post report: Safeguards against Afghan torture in place, NATO chief says.