Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the health category.

Can you follow the logic?

Today’s Star reports that according to 15 top health ‘experts’, scrapping the mandatory long-form census would put at risk the health of our most vulnerable citizens. (H/T NNW)

O.K. I was intrigued by this argument and read further:

Cherie Miller, director of community health at the Regent Park Community Health Centre, said their clients, many of whom live in extreme poverty, will not — and may not know how to — fill out a voluntary survey. The mandatory long-form census, she said, “actually gives our folks the chance to have a voice.

So if the form is mandatory, then they’ll know how to fill it out?

Obviously I’m missing something here.

Ontario voters seeing yellow

Further to yesterday’s post on Dalty-Lyin’s:

Peter Shawn Taylor (editor-at-large at Macleans) has a great op-ed in today’s Record -  Yellow is the new green: Why dandelions are about to get political. He explains how dandelions could become a wedge issue in the next Ontario election.

The unforeseen consequences of yielding to the Gang-Green crowd could affect your child’s safety. For example, there are more sports injuries on playing fields that have been allowed to turn to weeds due to rock-hard soil in dry weather.  And replacing it with artificial turf is less environmentally friendly for a number of reasons and is very hot to play on.

Of course lawns and fields can easily become filled with noxious weeds that can affect air quality and cause breathing problems in the heat. Cities themselves will become hotter and trees will die off easier without the ability to intervene.  And lost trees become a problem not just for aesthetics and cooling, but also because we then lose that ability to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.  How is that better for the environment?

Taylor explains how Tim Hudak is ready to harness and direct homeowners’ anger:

Combine all this with the anger of homeowners who are watching their lawns disappear under a sea of yellow and the pesticide ban could become a major headache for McGuinty. The Progressive Conservatives are already signalling they intend to fight the next election on the (weedy) front yards of the province.

Ontario Tory leader Tim Hudak was one of the few provincial politicians to vote against the pesticide bill in 2008. In a stump-style speech last week, he referred repeatedly and aggressively to the ban: “While [the Ontario Tories] are focused on creating jobs and defending the family budget, the Nanny Premier is worried about saving you from the menace of the plastic bag and protecting the dandelions on your lawn.”

Later he promised to get government “out of our personal lives, our homes, our fridges, our backyards.”

Now that I have a new grandson I can somewhat understand the concerns of environmentalists but I think there could be a middle ground. What I would like to see is a change in the law that only allows licensed, qualified experts to treat lawns that have problems and allow them the right to buy products that are deemed to be safe by the federal Pest Management Regulatory Agency.

That way we can be assured that the approved products would be properly applied and only used when necessary. It would cost a bit more than doing it yourself but it would be safer and at least allow the homeowner the choice of saving their turf.

But in Dalty-Lyin’s world it’s his way or the highway.

And that’s just where I’d like to send him —-> far, far down the highway away from Queen’s Park.

Or maybe he’ll cave under pressure just like he did on sex-ed and Andre Marin.

*   *   *   *

Related

Provincial Ministries Facing Lawsuits Following Pesticide Bans – Inside Golf


Lawn Care Industry Sues to Overturn Ontario Pesticide Ban
- SafeLawns

Pesticide issue heads to court – CNW

Oh yeah?  And who’s going to pay for the Ontario Government’s legal fees, I wonder?

Ontario’s Pesticide Ban Being Monitored By BC – BC Golf News

Wanted: New Premier for Ontario – The Strong Conservative

Suffocating in Ontario

The seeds of Dalton McGuinty’s dandelion fetish were sown a year ago, and we are now reaping the harvest – Ontario looks like a slum.

Some people have just given up, letting the weeds completely take over their property. Once beautiful municipal green spaces are now festering eye-sores.

But worse, it is almost impossible to breath in any fresh air that is not polluted by little white fluff floating around and getting into your eyes, nose and lungs.

Connie Woodchuck has no love of this enforced weed takeover either – The fluffy white stuff of May:

We’ve had a full year of Dalton McGuinty’s pesticide ban now and what have we learned?

That none of the “alternative” weed control products work.

That it’s impossible to dig a zillion dandelions out of a lawn by hand.

That in big enough numbers, dandelions can make a whole town or city — even a province — look shabby and depressed.

That when the grass is pushed out and the weeds take over, that nice lush lawn turns rock-hard and dust-dry. Mine is brown already and it’s not even June.

That you have to mow your grass more often to keep it looking decent, if not great. That means way more air pollution as lawn mowers are heavy polluters...

Ah yes, inhaling the noxious fumes of gas lawn mowers is much better for you than pesticides which Health Canada still allows and says are safe when used properly.

And unless you have a cordless electric mower, you’ll be paying through the nose to mow that lawn during the peak hours as determined by your McGuinty-mandated Smart Meter, unless you want to really sock it to the neighbours and chop down those dandelions at 2 a.m.  You can add HST to all that as well.

And all the fluff and crap that you’re sending into the air is going to choke you and your neighbours anyway.  I’m sure Nanny Dalton will be mandating outdoor gas masks anytime now.  Or does he even care?

People with asthma are likely to end up sucking even more precious tax dollars out of the system now, but don’t worry. Nanny Dalton will just up the ‘health tax’ and continue to throw it into general revenues, making sure there’s a bit leftover for his union friends when their contracts come up.

When this bone-headed law was implemented a year ago, one reader suggested we start calling dandelions McGuintys.

Yes, I agree. We should all call them that forevermore.  And I know one tall, scrawny McGuinty that I can’t wait to see plucked right out of the Premier’s office come October 2011.

*   *   *   *

Update

Greg has a better idea. Let’s call them Dalty Lyin’s!!!

*   *   *   *

The following is an actual Liberal commercial from the last election:

Blast from the past (Kevin Gaudet):

This tax has nothing to do with health care and everything to do with a revenue grab.

Health care spending in Ontario has grown at a fairly constant rate, before and after the imposition of the tax, just as it did in Alberta. The tax revenue goes to general revenue and allows this government to fund its pet projects, like corporate welfare subsidies or slush funds, for example. The tax merely serves as a crutch for the government’s spending problem

Ontario health tax review called a ‘sham’.

Option: Life

Women with unwanted pregnancies in Vancouver will now have the option of dropping their newborns off at St. Paul’s Hospital and being afforded complete anonymity and protection from charges of abandonment.

My guess is that this service would appeal to a young woman or teenager who was unaware or couldn’t face up to the fact she was pregnant until she went into labour (yes, it happens!).   In this kind of situation the individual might otherwise panic and leave the infant in a toilet or a nearby dumpster.  So now the Hospital will take the baby no questions asked.

The challenge would be to get the information out to the community and schools so that women can realize that they do have a legal, ethical option.

The measure seems to be getting a lot of support – except from today’s  Globe editorial:

And because the drop-off zone is near the emergency-room entrance – it’s a door that, when pulled, opens to a shelf with a bassinet – it is lacking in anonymity.

No, that’s not true. There is no surveillance video.

Another objection the Globe puts forth is the cost of promoting the program:

One might counter that the site should be promoted so the women who might avail themselves of it do know about it. But how much money should be spent on such promotion to reach isolated, desperate women?

Gosh, how much could that possibly cost to run a few ads and explain the program in the community? I’ll bet some companies would be prepared to do it as a public service.

And how much is an infant’s life worth anyway?

Here’s the clincher:

But harm-reduction doesn’t mean no harm at all. Babies who are abandoned at a hospital have no medical history. They also lose the chance to be adopted by family members – father, uncles, aunts, grandparents.

So is the editorial board trying to say that leaving the baby to die in the dumpster would be better than having no medical history? I think there are a lot of adopted people in that very situation even today. In fact I know one personally. Would they be better off dead?

And the argument about the family not being given the chance to adopt is bogus. If the teenager/woman is that reluctant to confide in her family, chances are that the family dynamics would be such that they wouldn’t be supportive anyway.

Yes, in an ideal world we would not have pregnant women panicking and leaving their babies to die. They would have already made adoption arrangements and meticulously recorded their medical history. They would seek safe, medical assistance throughout their pregnancy and delivery.

But in the real world this seems like a positive step towards looking after maternal and child health right here in Canada.

Admittedly it doesn’t fit in well with the Culture of Death that some media and politicians seem to prefer.

*   *   *   *

Related

Maternal health and paternalismMargaret Somerville.

Don’t forget to check out the comments.

Abortion – Kevin Libin, National Post:

…Canada is the only democratic country on Earth with nothing to say, legislatively, about abortion, and all major federal parties have vowed to leave it that way.

In a country with no rules, and a political class evidently terrified of even considering any, the status quo silence seems bound to persist, even if a large number of voters preferred it didn’t. If Canadians, at least publicly, are incapable of even tolerating an edifying discussion about something like Mr. Harper’s maternal health initiative, so loosely connected to Canadian abortion rights, without falling into predictably paralyzing positions and rhetoric, there seems little hope of us ever seriously confronting it at all…

And in case you missed them, both Sandy and Stephen Taylor have some excellent posts on the subject of ‘culture wars’.

*   *   *   *

Big Update

West Coast Teddi has given us the email address for St. Paul’s in case you would like to find out how to make a donation to this very worthy cause.

*   *   *   *

Sunday Update

Don’t let abortion issue hijack maternal health agenda
Belinda Stronach (H/T Gabby)

G8 gives thumbs up to Harper’s maternal health projectVancouver Sun (H/T Sammy)

*   *   *   *

Gabby finds some very important information on U.S. abortion policy here.

Green energy means leaner times

What’s in your wallet fellow Ontarians?  It sure won’t be money:

Consumers will face higher electricity bills as part of an unprecedented $8-billion plan announced Thursday to create more renewable energy in Ontario.

People can expect an additional $5 per month on their hydro bills by 2012 — the latest in a series of incremental increases to taxpayers’ electricity rates…

( . . . )

Two weeks ago, the government quietly introduced a new charge to help cover $53 million of the Liberals’ conservation and green-energy program, which is expected to add about $4 a year to the average electricity bill.

A few days later, Ontario Power Generation said it was applying to increase its rates by 9.6 per cent starting next January. That would add about $2.75 to the average monthly electricity bill — all on top of the extra eight per cent consumers will have to pay when the 13 per cent HST takes effect in July.

The $5 extra a month attached to Thursday’s announcement would be in addition to those increases

The Globe’s Karen Howlett points out that “Ontario is about to rival Prince Edward Island as the province with the highest electricity prices in Canada, and rates will, for the first time, exceed the average cost of keeping the lights on in the United States.”

How are Ontario seniors supposed to cope? Turn off the A/C and die of heat stroke? Well I guess that could help alleviate the health care crunch.

But how exactly are skyrocketing electrical costs going to attract business to our lovely have-not province?

Ontario – On the equalization dole forever.

*   *   *   *

Saturday Update

Margaret Wente’s column in the Globe is a MUST-READWelcome to the wacky world of green power:

The heart of their strategy is to pay massive subsidies to wind, solar and other renewable energy producers – many of them large multinational corporations – for the next 20 years.

Some people think this is a terrible idea. One of them is George Monbiot, the environmental firebrand in Britain, which has just introduced its own subsidy scheme. “The feed-in tariffs [the rates paid to power generators such as Mr. Creeggan] about to be introduced here are extortionate, useless and deeply regressive,” he fumed. “The technologies the scheme will reward are comically inefficient.”

Get that? Even George Monbiot thinks it’s a bad idea!!! We are doomed.

*    *    *    *

Sunday Update

Electricity price rises a concern to industryStar (H/T NewsWatchCanada):

...One analyst – who had already predicted a hefty increase in power prices – says the contracts will push power bills even higher for consumers and businesses.

High prices mean higher costs, said Ian Howcroft, Ontario vice-president of Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters.

“Some of the members we represent have real concerns about their future ability to operate in Ontario if – as one member puts it – we become an island of high prices,” Howcroft said...

Sometimes I hate being right.

Thursday Update

Electricity prices head upwards – Star

The Asbestos Enablers

Even though Jean Charest and the Federal Conservative government frequently find themselves at odds on environmental issues, they appear to be co-conspirators regarding the export of asbestos as Jeffrey Simpson points out this morning:

…But Mr. Charest said it was up to India to act if it felt asbestos led to health problems. He was accompanied by a representative of an asbestos lobby group that receives money from both the federal and provincial governments; his group, he said, gives information to asbestos users about its possible risks. In other words, caveat emptor! Meantime, it’s business as usual for Quebec’s asbestos exports…

Or is it just the environment that Jean Charest cares about? Not the health of people in developing countries?

And to the Conservative government, how about showing some backbone on this issue? You really don’t have much more to lose in Quebec anyway.

And to Mr. Iffy – Have you finally figured out where you stand?

Hypocrites the lot of you!

*    *    *    *

*   *   *   *

Charest faces questions about export of asbestos during visit to India – Record

UN climate guru on skeptics: “hope that they apply it (asbestos) to their faces every day”
- B.C Blue

Charest: Asbestos “is politically part of our history” – B.C. Blue

*   *   *   *

Feb. 12 Update

On hot seat over asbestos – Gazette:

…On the trade mission, the premier was quoted in La Presse as saying “Chrysotile (asbestos) can be used in a safe manner; this is what WHO reports say. It is not a banned substance. It is up to the government of India to put the necessary laws in place.”

In fact, the World Health Organization has said that all types of asbestos, including the type mined in Quebec (chrysotile) cause asbestosis, mesothelioma and cancer of the lung, and recommends against continued use of any form of asbestos. The International Labour Organization adopted a resolution in 2006 urging the elimination of use of all forms of asbestos and of materials containing asbestos…

Furious George runs for mayor

Please take one for for the team, Toronto.

We don’t want him back.

*   *   *   *

Update:

‘Furious George’ Smitherman was the premier’s enforcer - Jim Coyle

…That Furious George was, as the Star’s Robert Benzie has reported, “gang-tackled” by his cabinet colleagues on the concessions he was making to Samsung was remarkable.

That word of this leaked out spoke volumes about the declining regard in which he was held…

Somewhat related - McGuinty blows smoke on windLorrie Goldstein

(H/T)

Good Riddance, Smitherman. You can have him, Toronto.Wind Concerns Ontario

And straight out of Bizarro World: Warren Kinsella votes Tory (Globe)

*   *   *   *

Sunday Update:

Lobbyist played dual role – Sun:

The Toronto Centre Liberal riding association raised nearly $430,000 for George Smitherman in 2008 — the same year its president, Jason Grier, lobbied ministries Smitherman led for a long list of corporate and government clients.

The vice-president of Canadian communications consultancy firm Hill and Knowlton has been the volunteer head of the riding association since March 11, 2008 — where he oversaw a successful fundraising campaign that has made it by far the richest in the party — dwarfing even Premier Dalton McGuinty’s riding…