Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the David Miller category.

ABP gaining traction?

Is the ‘Anyone But’ Party going to be the big winner at the Ontario municipal and provincial level?  And if so, how would that impact the next Federal election?

While driving home yesterday afternoon we happened to tune into AM 640 and Arlene Bynon’s program was centering on these questions – especially the first.

Lorrie Goldstein was interviewed on the subject and has a column in this morning’s Sun outlining the effect of the arrogant lefties’ assaults on Rob Ford – it is causing support to increase for Ford’s more fiscally conservative stance.  The tax and spend mentality of the NDPers in Toronto may have finally hit the wall of voters’ tolerance, especially in the outlying ‘burbs.

Christina Blizzard picks up this theme and extrapolates it to the Ontario Liberal government which is now the status quo and becoming increasingly arrogant and out-of-touch with the taxpayer.  The 2011 election may see a backlash there.  In fact it has already started:

…For the first time since he was re-elected in 2007, Dalton McGuinty is trailing the PC leader in the polls.

Ipsos figures show the PCs at 36%, have a narrow lead over the Liberals, at 35%.

The NDP is at 18% and Greens are at 11%.

Sure, a slim 1% margin hardly makes Tory Tim Hudak a shoo-in for the premier, but it gives the Tories a needed boost.

That figure isn’t the most important one. On every question, the Tories were ahead. A whopping 64% of those polled want a change in government.

What’s most surprising about the figures is that Hudak is largely unknown. It’s not so much Hudak they’re voting for as it is McGuinty they’re voting against.

They want anyone but him…

So if voter intention is moving against the status quo in Toronto and Ontario, what about the federal scene? Are the incumbent Tories in trouble?

My guess is not, because of the minority situation where the Government’s hands are bound by the 3 opposition parties and the constant threat of an election. So federally the fact is that the status quo is still the tax & spend mentality because a more fiscally-responsible position would be trashed by the left.

Therefore I think that if the Harper Conservatives could put forth a vision of Canada that would safeguard our economy, our communities and our borders, and restore respect to the taxpayer, then a majority is a realistic possibility – especially if it builds on the anyone-but-lefties momentum.

*   *   *   *

Related

Iggy to Harper: “We make the rules!”David Akin (Great truth-ad fodder for the next election!)

And how about this from the same source?

The Conservatives, for the last three years, have raised twice as much money from twice as many people as all the other parties, including the Liberals, combined.

“Politics is not a spectator sport,” Ignatieff told the crowd here. “We need your help. We are up against the toughest political machine, the nastiest political machine in the history of Canadian politics.”

So any grass root supporters donating to the Conservative Party are enabling the nastiest political machine in the history of Canadian politics, according to Michael Ignatieff. Don’t you feel ashamed of yourselves?

I’m sure that Maria Augimeri would not be impressed with your progress on the ‘learning curve’ either.

Stephen Harper – Teflon PM?

Rex Murphy has a somewhat provocative article in today’s National Post - Stephen Harper’s sunshine moment.

On the surface it seems quite complementary but Rex wonders how it is that PM Harper seems to be getting a ‘free pass’ on the G20 controversies:

…They, too, realize that managing the “after-event,” getting the right spin out, is just about as important as managing the event. The Mayor of Toronto is out there, and even the McGuinty government is being asked to explain some of its actions, its “slippery” use of a regulation (which some claim didn’t exist) giving police special powers of detention and arrest.

Curiously, the most substantial question about summit security, its inordinate and still unbelievable cost — more than a billion dollars to protect a couple of days of meetings — is almost, now, after the weekend tumults, getting a total pass. It was controversial, a real issue, before this weekend. How could the federal government, a Conservative government, justify such a massive outlay just to secure a meeting?

Well, thanks to the ructions of the black bloc, it’s the lowest-rung question on the post-summit agenda. And who’s the great beneficiary in all this? Why, Stephen Harper. Everyone else, one way or another, is caught in the post-summit snarl, but not its host.

That fact doesn’t rise to amazing, but it is impressive. To Harper’s other skills, perhaps we may now add that of levitation–the ability to float free or above of controversies consuming everyone else…

Well I’m not sure how much of a pass the PM is actually getting. There are still many criticizing the choice of Toronto as the G20 venue.

However, it is deliciously ironic to observe the Telfon Premier acquire a little nick in his slick coating. Perhaps it is the beginning of the end of his choke-hold on Ontario.

We can only hope.

*   *   *   *

Related

Self-anointed G20 ‘journalists’ should get real Christie Blatchford (H/T Richco):

…Fourth, since with the wisdom of hindsight it is now apparent that everyone knew that the anarchists/Black Bloc types would try to wreak havoc on the city, why are the organizers of the legitimate protests not being questioned about their accountability? They too presumably knew – as did police and security forces – that their peaceful demonstrations likely would be disrupted; what steps did they take to stop such a hijacking?

( . . . )

…Finally, how amusing it is to see Toronto, press and public alike, whip themselves into a frenzy of outrage over alleged police inaction and then alleged police overreaction, when all of this, in terms even more stark, happened in Caledonia, Ont., from 2006 onwards, and no one gave a fig.

Exactly.

And another tip from RichcoA coalition? Don’t we have one already? Paul Wells:

...Another evergreen Ottawa myth asserts that Harper is somehow unfulfilled without a parliamentary majority. But he has had a majority for four years, thanks to a succession of not-ready-for-prime-time Liberals. Every budget he has ever whipped up has passed with Liberal votes.

And in concert with the Liberals, Stephen Harper is changing this country. He was able to gut environmental oversight of energy projects in the middle of a historic energy-sector environmental disaster. He is stuffing the nation’s prisons like Christmas geese. He spent $1 billion turning the country’s biggest city into a demonstration of the necessity (if not, ahem, the effectiveness) of tough policing against thugs, rabble, bicyclists and other miscreants. Inside the riot zone, with the world watching, he stared down Barack Obama in a debate over continued fiscal stimulus vs. relative budgetary restraint…

Yeah good point. The Liberals were the Junior Coalition Partners helping to pass the budget that allowed the G8 and G20 to happen so I guess they deserve some of the credit or criticism as the case may be. Wouldn’t have happened otherwise.

If only there were more Torontonians like this guy:

*   *   *   *

Catastrophism collapsesLawrence Solomon (H/T Maz2):

…Support for global-warming programs is also in tatters in the U.S., where polls show — as in Europe — that the great majority rejects global-warming catastrophism. The public resents repeated attempts to pass cap and trade legislation over their objections, contributing to the fall in popularity of President Barack Obama and Congress. Public opinion surveys now predict that this November’s elections will see sweeping change in the United States, with legislators who have signed on to the global-warming hypothesis being replaced by those who don’t buy it.

In the lead-up to the Toronto meetings and throughout them, one country — Canada — and one leader — Prime Minister Stephen Harper — have stood out for avoiding the worst excesses associated with climate change. Dubbed the Colossal Fossil three years running by some 500 environmental groups around the world, Canada — and especially Harper — are reviled among climate-change campaigners for failing to fall into line.

Not coincidentally, Canada has also stood out for having best withstood the financial crisis that beset the world. Fittingly, Canada and its leader played host to the meetings.

*   *   *   *

Sunday Update

For the Black Bloc, it’s mission accomplished – Angelo Persichilli:

…I don’t agree with Ottawa’s decision to have the summits in two different places but I support the idea of holding it in Toronto, whether at Ontario Place or the convention centre. We can’t accept the notion that world leaders must meet on the top of mountains because we are afraid of a few criminals

Rob Ford slightly ahead: Nanos

It seems that Torontonians are finally realizing that sound fiscal management is vital to the future of a healthy, world class city.

On the other hand I find myself cheering for George Smitherman because I’m afraid he’d go back to Ontario politics if he lost the mayoralty race.

And we sure don’t need that.

*   *   *   *

Update

Kelly McParland: David Miller’s legacy could be Rob Ford - Full Comment

Province of Toronto?

Maverick Conservative MP Bill Murdoch has caused quite a stir with his recent suggestion that Toronto part ways with the Rest Of Ontario (ROO) and become its own province.  Adrian MacNair touched on this yesterday.

As Lorrie Goldstein notes, “With 2.5 million people, Toronto is larger than six provinces — Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador and Prince Edward Island.”

Goldstein is one of many on the Toronto side that seem quite happy with the idea.  They are tired of Toronto having to go begging to Queen’s Park for permission to make changes in areas such as bylaws, taxation and transportation and feel that Toronto needs more power given the size of the population.

And the rural side is just plain fed up with Toronto, and with  Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty who seems to pander to the large urban perspective on issues that directly impact the farmers and folks in smaller cities who have to deal with wind turbines, coyotes, and closed schools and hospitals.

Progressive Conservative leader Tim Hudak doesn’t agree with Murdock that Toronto should separate but he acknowledges the frustration among those living in the ROO.

Bill Murdoch’s initiative is unlikely to be successful but it sure does have people talking.

Ultimately the challenge will be how to  reconcile these two Ontario solitudes.  It could even become an election issue.

*   *   *   *

Update

Don Martin: Toronto — the province Canada loves to hate? – National Post. (The comments are better than the column.)

*   *   *   *

Thursday Update:

MPP happy to have sparked discussion – Sun Times:

...Murdoch has recently taken issue with Queen’s Park’s lack of understanding on dealing with coyotes, a rural nuisance.

Murdoch also cited the Liberal-created Green Energy Act, along with the Endangered Species Act and Ontario Water Resources Act as causing hardship for rural Ontarians. He said his latest criticism of Toronto speaks to bigger concerns with democracy at Queen’s Park. Murdoch said the premier of Ontario’s office holds too much power. Cabinet ministers, deputy ministers and parliamentary assistants should be selected by caucus, he said, and MPPs should not be forced to vote as the party dictates.

Murdoch admits his desire for a Toronto-free Ontario is a “long shot,” but said he hopes his comments will lead to some positive change for rural Ontario.

More good news for Canada

David Miller has just announced that he won’t seek a third term. (Check out the comments at the Post.)

But why should we outside of the GTA care about Toronto?

Well, the financial mismanagement and socialist policies have affected us all. Toronto begs Ontario for handouts, and then Liberal Government in Ontario turns to the ROC for the same.  For the first time Ontario is now a have-not province.

For the good of Canada, Toronto needs to elect a mayor who can demonstrate some fiscal prudence and yet still deliver crucial services. It will be a challenge after Miller, but the National Post already has a list up of potential candidates for the job. Who would you pick?  My personal preference at this point is Karen Stintz.

The main message here is -  get out and vote when you have a chance!!  Don’t sit home. Municipal elections are extremely important.

Ex-Ontario AG facing charges?

The Toronto Star is reporting this morning that ex-Ontario General Michael Bryant has been arrested after a fatal collision with a cyclist last night.  The Globe says he is in police custody. Other sources are reporting that he is simply ‘being questioned’.

In any case, the optics are not good for David Miller’s ‘Invest Toronto’.

Premier Dalton McGuinty must be breathing a sigh of relief this morning that Bryant had resigned this past May.  McGuinty has enough to deal with right now. Ironically the provincial by-election for Bryant’s vacant seat will be held very soon on Sept. 17.

This one will be most interesting to watch.   PC Candidate Sue-Ann Levy has long been railing against Miller’s “socialist silly hall”. I wish her all the best in her attempt to secure the seat of St. Paul’s.

*   *   *   *

Update: Please note that the Star changed their headline around 9 a.m.

However, the Globe is now reporting that Bryant has been placed under arrest and is facing charges.

*   *   *   *

Wednesday Update:

Michael Bryant’s deadly duelStar

Cabinet rock star had energy and egoOttawa Citizen:

…But as he garnered attention, he also accumulated enemies, including some in the premier’s office who saw him as overly ambitious.

“He went off on initiatives that he hadn’t cleared with the premier, made announcements that the premier hadn’t seen, took credit for stuff (he shouldn’t have),” said someone who worked closely with Bryant, who asked not to be identified...

Finally, we have a great editorial in today’s Record which pretty much sums up my thoughts on the matter:

While Bryant resigned from the provincial government earlier this year, he has served as Ontario’s minister of aboriginal affairs and economic development and was once the province’s attorney general. In this role he was Ontario’s chief law officer, the person responsible for the conduct of prosecutions on behalf of the province, the person in charge of the entire court system. In this role he was responsible for a crackdown on unsafe driving, laws that were tougher on street racing and drunk driving. And in this role Bryant not only knew and worked with the people who ran the courts, he was their boss.

Because of this history, Ontario’s justice system will not only need to do the right thing according to our laws, it must be seen by the public as doing the right thing. It must act fairly, dispassionately and without any hint of favour. Given that charges of criminal negligence causing death and dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death were swiftly laid, it is obvious the authorities are prepared to act vigorously. In addition to this, the court should appoint a special prosecutor to make the case against Bryant, someone who has no history of any contact with Bryant and quite possibly a lawyer who has been retired for some time...

*   *   *   *

Friday Update:

Bryant’s custody stay rappedStar:

The black suit, baby blue dress shirt and striped lime green tie had already been dropped off at the station before Staff Sgt. Brian Bowman began his shift at 4:30 a.m.

“I’ve never seen anybody bring a suit – personally – in my 28 years,” Bowman said yesterday, when asked if that was unusual…

Jackpot!

Mark Ferguson has just cashed in on behalf of Local 416.

The National Post has the details:

“The City wanted to terminate and prosecute those few who got a little excited on the picket lines. We made sure of amnesty for everybody involved. What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas!” he said, fist in air, to resounding applause.

Mr. Ferguson’s sin city slogan made reference to the amnesty clause, one stipulation in a controversial back-to-work protocol that held up ratification votes for 416 workers and dragged negotiations on until late Wednesday night.

In exchange for City-sanctioned amnesty, the union made what Mr. Ferguson called “the difficult decision” not to punish what the union calls “scabs” — unionized workers who crossed picket lines during the strike…

So any illegal acts already committed won’t be punished in exchange for a promise not to bully and intimidate.

To say that David Miller blew it would be an understatement.

But there are so many public sector unionized voters in Toronto, that I am sure that he will get voted in again next election (think police, fire, teachers, postal, various levels of government as well as Toronto inside and outside workers -  Solidarity.)

Why would the public service unions in Toronto want to get rid of such an easy mark?

Last one to leave Toronto please turn out the compact fluorescents.

*   *   *   *

Update: Is Miller really finished?Adam Radwanski:

…Miller’s performance at this afternoon’s press conference has verged on the ridiculous. In fairness, he’s had a long summer, and is probably underslept. But his attacks on other councillors for having the temerity to criticize the settlement are way over the top.

To suggest it’s unconscionable to consider forcing Torontonians to go without daycare and garbage collection and the joys of Centre Island doesn’t really hold up when you’ve been the one asking Torontonians to spend half their summer doing just that. Nor is it “appalling” to oppose a contract that doesn’t meet the goals that you publicly set out earlier in the dispute.

It’s an ugly side of their mayor Torontonians are seeing today. Strong opposition or not, he’s not helping his cause.

I totally agree.

Toronto on strike: How council may vote on the strikeNational Post.

Now here is a protest that might have some justification: OPSEU: Students Stage Protests on Civic Holiday Weekend at Four Popular Provincial Parks (Marketwire)

*   *   *   *

Friday Update: Protocol gives amnesty to misbehaving strikers - Globe:

…However, under a separate agreement, unspecified disciplinary action is expected to be taken against one senior union official who is also facing criminal charges for allegedly stealing two ambulances.

Sources said Glenn Fontaine, chairman of the ambulance unit of the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 416, will be disciplined, but not fired.

Of six people Toronto police arrested in connection with the 39-day long strike, four were charged with a total of 13 criminal offences, police said.

Mr. Fontaine was the only one of the four who was a striker. The rest were members of the public…


Analysis: Miller’s costly strike victory
– Post

Bonne chance, Toronto.

*   *   *   *

Sunday Update: Torontonians the heroes in this strikeSun

David Miller: Hanging by a thread Globe

Myths and reality of the union movementAngelo Persichilli