What’s behind the anti-Palin movement?
Bashing Sarah Palin seems to have become a North American sport. Post-election she is still getting it from the left and the right.
Why?
Even my beloved National Post has seen fit to group Sarah Palin with the likes of John Edwards and Mark Foley, which drew the ire of this reader:
Re: Political Rehab, Araminta Wordsworth, Nov. 13.
I used to love the National Post. But the way the Post has treated Sarah Palin throughout the campaign and now with this article has gone over the line. Having her picture between photos of two politicians who were caught in compromising positions is beyond the pale …
In any case, I went in search of some answers and came across this excellent new blog - Palin’s Bear.
The author ‘Bear’ explains the reason for this blog:
…I’ve had my fill of people taking cheap shots at Sarah while ignoring everything else. I’ve had enough of it and it’s time to start fighting back. This site will not be updated everyday. When I come across something that helps her I will post it. I will also post the vicious stuff being pandered in the media so that readers are aware…
It’s a compelling compendium of articles that may help us understand the attacks.
Obviously, many find Sarah Palin threatening. The good old boys in the GOP seem to want her gone.
As Peter Worthington points out in an article highlighted by Bear:
"Again, the question begs, why so much Republican venom on a loser? The answer may be she’s the only one to emerge from the 2008 election campaign with a strong and seemingly committed base within the party, with aspirations to challenge for the presidency in 2012. This has Republican so-called “moderates” in a tizzy."
Enjoy Palin 2012 [- which the author seems to have changed today to Palin's Bear. I like it!]
And let’s hope we see her running again - This time crashing the old boys’ club for real change, as America’s first female President.
* * * *
Sunday Update: WELCOME Jack’s Newswatch readers! And thanks to Mary T for letting me know.
Unambiguously Ambidextrous: Sarah Palin does what some of her fans would not. Praise Obama.


November 15th, 2008 at 11:13 pm
I love Sarah Palin. And I hope she runs in 2012. Now I am an atheist so it’s not like I’m saying this because we have the same theological beliefs. Far from it. I’m saying this because she’s an average person. She can relate to the masses. It’s nice to see a politician who’s a “regular Jane (or Joe)” for a change. I’m tired of politicians who claim to feel our pain when that’s the furthest thing from the truth. It’s one of the many reasons I love Stephen Harper.
Palin is one of us. And by us I don’t mean conservative. I mean someone who has to work for a living. Someone who understands there’s real consequences to the policy that governments implement.
November 15th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
I agree that Sarah Palin is a bonus for the Republicans. she will repudiate the slander that has been directed to her. She will be a force in 2010.
November 15th, 2008 at 11:32 pm
Governor Palin scares the crap out of the “establishment”, both Democrat and Republican, hence the extreme venom and vicious displays of hate being aided and abetted by the MSM (who also don’t know how to deal with her or people like “Joe the plumber”). They all know she can really break all their rice bowls if she succeeds.
It is my hope she can forge alliances with other Republicans of similar views and stature (think of Governor Bobby Jindal or South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford) to capture the base and the Party from the current powers that be.
Whatever her intellectual powers (and actually watching her in action vs reading the MSM “spin” reveals someone who is probably far smarter than she lets on), Governor Jindal and Sanford can provide the gravitas to add to her formidable public charm. Add a team of real conservative and libertarian operators to do the grunt work and now we have some real horsepower.
While I admit I am not up on the “who’s who” of US conservative or libertarian intellectuals and powers that be, imagine having people like Victor Davis Hansen or Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) on the team. Other people who are more well versed can play the “add the name game”
Good hunting, Governor Palin!
November 16th, 2008 at 12:04 am
I am also a huge fan of Gov. Palin. I have a feeling she’s going to get the last laugh on all of her detractors one day. And I can’t wait.
I believe the main reason she is so hated is because she is pro-life and proud of it. Simple as that.
Dennis Miller made me laugh the other day on O’Reilly when he said Palin looks like she has a great sex life with a great husband and the feminazis can’t tolerate someone being happy when they themselves are perpetually miserable.
Could be some truth to that.
November 16th, 2008 at 12:36 am
I saw a vid of her doing a press conference at the Republican Governors Association.(sorry..no link) She looks exhausted and distracted. I am a huge fan of hers for all the reasons here, but her answers at the press conference did not go well. I hope she isn’t burnt out.
November 16th, 2008 at 1:33 am
Sarah Palin has room to grow. and she will need to grow if she wants to be more successful than her last VP run.
between the psycho-political pressure cooker environment of everyone out to get her or everyone out to save her, she has to decide and demonstrate how she would rise above the flames.
one advantage she has over the likes of Hillary Clinton is that she’s not pressured to conform to the political style of anyone in particular (like Hillary was politically conditioned to be a Bill copycat).
that is all i will say on the matter. i’m cautiously optimistic about Palin 2012 (or 2016 as the case may be).
November 16th, 2008 at 3:42 am
I like Sarah Palin but I have to say that she was not ready. She lacks the experience for the position and she is too naive when it comes to the press. With some coaching and some effort, she will become a formidable force the next time around. She’s very intelligent, strong, and shallow as this sounds, she’s extremely attractive. She has achieved what women have fought to achieve: she is governor of her state (and I don’t care if it’s “only Alaska”), she has maintained a stable marriage, she has borne and raised children, and she enjoys a good life.
As for her religious leanings - so what? I don’t know why the media has to take shots at somebody for having religious beliefs. I didn’t see her taking shots at people with no religious beliefs. This whole business of trumpeting the virtues of freedom and inclusion and then turning around and attacking somebody for his or her Christian faith is disgusting.
If my guess is right, she will spend the next three years honing her skill as a politician. Unfortunately, the honesty and openess that is so appealing will be lost as she learns how to talk like a politician. My only hope is that she does not lose her basic honesty and openess in the process.
Go, Sarah, Go.
November 16th, 2008 at 7:47 am
Initially Sarah Palin stole some thunder from the “old boys” but they soon got to work and skewered her. The media were willing accomplices, some of them women. She didn’t have a chance.
It was a disgrace the way they tore into her personal life as well even though she had her husband and children with her and on display. Who wouldn’t be distracted dealing with that?
She was not quite prepared for it, betting next time around THEY better be prepared for Sarah Palin.
November 16th, 2008 at 8:06 am
I am amazed that nobody seems to want to examine the record of Governor Palins achievements.
The voters in the U.S. have just elected a President who has no record of achievement at all. Nothing.
At the same time, Governor Palin is touted as “Not Ready”?
Sure she is attractive, draws crowds, yada,yada.
Look at what she has DONE. Its on the record.
That is what is most impressive.
November 16th, 2008 at 8:33 am
In four more years Palin has time to polish her profile, hit the all the talk shows, and drum up support from grassroot Americans.
I’ve asserted many times before that the old boys network in Canada, heck, even in municipal politics in Canada is still constipating our communities.
I don’t think that in Canada the move by females to encourage and develop women leaders is nearly strong enough.
My small Ontario town stands as an example of an old boys network which surrounds itself with more old boys. The token woman on our town council always seems to get buried in fluff or ignored altogether.
The really vocal females in my town(and there are many) seem get labeled with the “bitch” moniker and eventually bullied into silence. They also tend to stand out making themselves a target for the stuff the old boys like to sling.
November 16th, 2008 at 8:36 am
I enjoyed the energy,conviction and positive attitutude Palin expressed during the election.
Palin lossed because of McCain not McCain because of Palin.If ever there was a trial by fire she endured it and this will bode well for her future.
The real issue here seems to be to be the double standard used to judge women candidates, sadly,the ease of the media to report rumours as news and the visceral hatred expressed without consequence.
The ‘bashers’ can not destroy her but they can damage her however the grassroots support continues to grow and Republicans will do so at their peril.
Palin 2012….”you betcha”
November 16th, 2008 at 8:48 am
A friend, at dinner, made this stmt,-Sarah is us, the regular people. She uses slang, tells it like it is, and is not politically correct. She will be the same tomorrow, next week and next year. She is a real person, not a phony.
Congrats again, see JNW.
November 16th, 2008 at 8:53 am
Congrats again, see JNW.
Hey, thanks Mary T. For some reason I’m not getting pingbacks anymore, so I wouldn’t have known otherwise. I appreciate the heads-up.
November 16th, 2008 at 10:05 am
Wohoo! Now this is good news - top two liberal leader wannabes feuding already. See Kinsella and Bourque.
Doesn’t look great for the two front-runners. I wonder what the truth is?
November 16th, 2008 at 11:12 am
A bit off topic … WCT Reports … yesterday we had our civic / municipality elections. On the lower Vancouver Island (Victoria area) we have 13 municipalities with 4 to 8 councilors and mayors for each. to say the least it is confusing. But, the polls closed at 8pm and by 8:10 on local radio they were able to give results because of electronic voting machines. It is so slick - much like a scanner. Voting took less that 5 minutes.
Can Elections Canada learn anything from this?
November 16th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Did anyone watch the interview that Greta Van Sustern did on Fox News, this past week? The only major network that did was when Greta went right up to Alaska and filmed the whole thing in Sarah Palin’s beautiful environment in Alaska. It was so clear, crisp, and so right on why the ordinary people like her, because even though she is governor of Alaska she is a real ordinary human being with values that the ordinary people value.
Greta interviewed the Governor in her kitchen while she was making some things for them to snack on and you could see the beautiful lake and the trees and landscape of Alaska behind them. It was a real eye opener into what beauty Alaska contains.
So many of the Republicans are the wishy-washy kind wanting to fit in with the far left leaning democrats and will agree with everything the left wants to bring in, but Sarah Palin has clear cut values that the center left Republican do not have and only true conservative-Republicans like Palin do have.
FoxNews.com is the only major news network worth listening to as you at least get a fair and balanced news coverage that you won’t get from any other major American network as they are all left leaning. And as a Canadian I listen to them as often as I am able and not to CNN and their brand.
November 16th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
I think Worthington is the closest on this one. The GOP want to eliminate her as a candidate in the future, which isn’t a terribly difficult thing to do. Unbelievably, I think the left would be just peachy with Palin running again, given that they have such low regard for her. I also have a very low regard for her, but perhaps she’ll take these next two years to take a few courses, brush up on her basic political knowledge, perhaps even leave Alaska and become worldly. If, in four years, she can have added some substance to herself, she may be a more viable candidate.
November 16th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Yep Raphael, with any luck she might become as worldly as Barak Obama.
Why on earth would anyone put any effort into a run for president when to win the race takes absolutely no experience or track record?
November 16th, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Raphael: I visited your site first for confirmation of my reaction to your comment. I was right, Toronto.
Says it all for me.
November 16th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
Lee,
One might hope she would try and improve herself for that sake alone, regardless of the credentials of others.
Sufficed to say, if she gets massacred by a Katie Couric, or a Charlie Gibson in four years time again, she won’t be taken any more seriously than she is now.
November 16th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
JT,
I’m not entirely sure what your point is. I live in British Columbia, and I daresay my opinions are presented in a manner of objectivity.
Personally, I supported John McCain until he started mimicking George W, and then definitely abandoned all hope when he chose Sarah Palin. Before McCain I supported Fred Thompson. I also thought Mitt Romney would have made a good candidate in the end-run, but he lost as well.
November 16th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
JT,
I’m not entirely sure what your point is.
Same here.
November 16th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
Raphael, I too liked Fred Thompson. Theres a guy who would not get tied in knots by any reporter.
Kind of sad though, to think that regardless of schievements,or qualifications, the good people of the press can make or break a candidacy.
I am reminded of Craig Oliver shortly after the 2006 election here in Canada.
“We made Harper, and we can break him”
Kind of says it all.
November 16th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
I hope she is the Republican nominee in 2012. That will ensure another 4 years of Obama provided he does not screw things up too badly.
Of course she might actually put her nose to the grindstone and acquire some substance. But if the same vacuous nothing to say but you bethcha comes out of her mouth, she will definitely be helpful in assuring a Democratic win. There is nothing there. Do some homework. Maybe check out this site - http://syrin.vox.com/library/post/gearing-up-for-the-rnc—republican-for-a-reason.html or this one - http://mudflats.wordpress.com/
Many Alaskans have a negative opinion of her. Many who have known her her whole life.
But if the Republicans are smart, as they lick their wounds and reassess their fall from grace, they will find another standard bearer to carry their torch.
November 16th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
“Many Alaskans have a negative opinion of her. Many who have known her her whole life”.
What a silly statement.
The fact is, as is reported everywhere, Governor Palin has a higher approval rating than any Governor in the country.
There may be some who have a negative view, of course,
But to say “many” is misleading.
November 16th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
I also have a very low regard for her, but perhaps she’ll take these next two years to take a few courses, brush up on her basic political knowledge, perhaps even leave Alaska and become worldly.
Agreed. She initially interested me, but the more I saw (and heard) of her, the less impressed I was. As I’ve said before, just because they throw a conservative at you, doesn’t mean you must like them. The religious-right stuff just turns me off.
November 16th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
I think JT is kicking back smoking something on or from Texada or Lasqueti Island.
November 16th, 2008 at 11:06 pm
Those who dont like Governor Palin appear irrational to me.
All i hear is nebulous stuff like “religious -right”,
“not ready”, she needs to be more “worldly”.
These same people have no problem with President -elect Obama, who has less experience, belonged for 20 years to a church whose pastor was a radical American -hater, was introduced to the political scene by a domestic terrorist.
Look at what the Obamatrons did to two TV stations who dared to ask tough questions of Joe Biden.
Of course they could not ask tough questions of Obama, he was not available for interviews.
I have heard every speech that Palin gave since being selected as VP, and i never heard her once touting her religious beliefs.
As i said, not rational.
November 17th, 2008 at 8:30 am
The best assessment of the Palin situation is explained well by Dennis Miller with Bill O’Reilly . Kate over at SDA has the video, be sure to view.
November 17th, 2008 at 8:39 am
Thanks, Liz. Link here.
Hilarious!
November 17th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
tried to comment
unable to submit will try again
if this succeeds
November 17th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Lee-
“What a silly statement.
The fact is, as is reported everywhere, Governor Palin has a higher approval rating than any Governor in the country.
There may be some who have a negative view, of course,
But to say “many” is misleading.”
The use of “many” is not misleading. That you chose to be mislead is your problem. Many Alaskans do not approve of her. That they may be on the wrong side of some approval poll does not mean there are not many of them.
Regardless, it is not the “many” of Alaska who mattered in this election.
November 17th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I am disgusted by the anti Palin rhetoric
As a proud Canadian I am more disgusted by the anti Prime Minister Stephen Harper sentiment
I was disgusted with Jane of Craig and Jane Question period when during the pre-election period while interviewing Ministers from the elected Government of
Canada Jane referred to the Prime Minister of Canada as your Prime Minister
Is Jane Canadian? if not then I apoligize
If Jane is Canadian then she should respect the Prime Minister of Canada
Stephen Harper
November 17th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
I for one hope that Governor Palin fads into oblivion. Either she is a ditz, or she plays the cute little ditz card very well. Either way, these are not qualities very becoming of someone seeking to hold the highest office in the world.
From the Couric interview to getting “punked” by the Masked Avengers, she continually showed that my 15 year old step daughter has a more sound world view than her, and that is not saying much as most days I don’t even think that she is human!
November 17th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
MrMacrum, that is exactly the kind of misleading crap we get from detractors, and the MSM.
That is what annoys me.
When a Governor is approved of by a majority (large majority) of the electorate, to say that “many” disapprove is misleading unless you also state that many more approve.
November 18th, 2008 at 6:20 am
Lee - As I stated earlier, if you chose to be mislead, that is on you. I am under no obligation to be fair or balanced. You certainly are not. Why then do you expect me to be?
You say all you hear is irrational nebulous stuff coming from those who do not like Palin. Either you are not listening or your statement is misleading.
You prefer to drink the kool aid from your side but get odd when it is offered to you from the other side. You have been mislead if you believe what you do about Obama and his political birth happening in the living room of Ayers. You are being mislead when you believe Rev Wright was anything more than Obama’s pastor. Without hard evidence to the contrary, anything you embrace as fact has the potential to be misleading.
At least when I say many Alaskans do not approve of Palin, I have a poll to prove it.
You want to know when it was I decided that Palin was not up to being Vice President? When I read the questionaire she answerd when running for Governor.
The question was about the National Anthem. It asked if she would oppose removing the word “God” from it. Her answer was very enlightening. She answered something to the effect - “If the anthem was good enough for our founders, it is good enough for me.” On the surface a safe answer, right? But I expect my leaders to have more than the average grasp of civics and the history of my country. Our anthem was not written until the late 1800s and the word “God” was not added until the 1950s. I learned this in public school history. The fact she did not know this or have the instinct to check her answers before sending them in, (this was a take home questionaire BTW) this tells me she was short on substance and long on appearance. I am tired of voting in pols who have less of a clue than I do. I really gave her some time before I decided she was an empty suit.
Now, you can call me irrational. But from where I sit, your views on Obamna are irrational, not my views on Palin.
November 18th, 2008 at 7:29 am
It is so slick - much like a scanner. Voting took less that 5 minutes.
Can Elections Canada learn anything from this?
Sounds promising, Teddi!
November 18th, 2008 at 7:34 am
…I like Sarah Palin but I have to say that she was not ready. She lacks the experience for the position and she is too naive when it comes to the press. With some coaching and some effort, she will become a formidable force the next time around…
I agree with E of E on this one. She’ll need to learn how to handle the press for sure.
BTW, wasn’t it Obama who made a reference to the ‘President of Canada’ at one time during the election campaign?
November 18th, 2008 at 8:46 am
When it was announced that Sarah Palin was the VP pick, it was generally noted that she had more “experience” than Biden, Obama, or McCain.
So how did that morph into “lacks the experience”?
What we have just witnessed is an election won by a person with absolutely no “experience”.
How did that happen?
Check this out:
howobamagotelected.com
November 18th, 2008 at 10:02 am
And O said he would/had visited all 57 states and Biden commented on how FDR had gone on tv during some crisis. Funny how that never got media attention.
O has brought change already. When was the last time a group of protestors invaded a church service in the USA. Is that the change voters wanted. Reading some reports of the violence against certain groups it looks like it might be 4 years of Back to the 60s.
November 18th, 2008 at 10:06 am
Lee - it happened because she did lack experience. Being the mayor of a town the size of a large farm does not equate to the kind of experience one needs to step right in as a VP candidate. Her year as governor was certantly giving her some experience, but not enough to make as much hay over as the Republicans did. Her feet were not even finished drying yet. She was a poor choice this go around. Not her fault, it was McCain’s and the party elders who blew this one.
Her lack of general knowledge of things she should have known combined with her cavalier attitude about not being knowledgable created much of the animosity aimed at her. Confidence is fine. But when it steps up to being cocky without the necessary tools to back up that cockiness, the electorate often takes a dim view of that. Humility would have worked better. Owning up to her obvious shortcomings would have endeared her to more voters. She was/is obviously not stupid. Just not experienced or knowledgable enough yet. They brought her up from the minor league at least one election too soon.
It was the middle, the minorities, and the young who won this election for Obama. He played to them and it worked. The Republicans decided to play to the base. It cost them the election. Obama was consistent in his message. McCain was not. The republicans made so many mistakes, I am impressed that McCain did not lose by a larger margin.
November 18th, 2008 at 11:09 am
I was extremely disappointed to see that even John Snobelen has jumped on the anti-Palin bandwagon in his Toronto Sun article the other day. I would have thought John, of all people, would know what it’s like to have the media constantly bashing you.
P.S. MRMacrum, perhaps you could enlighten us to Obama’s vast well of experience that qualifies him to be President?
November 18th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Paul M - Why? The question was about Palin’s experience. That is what I addressed. The point is moot now anyway. The die is cast. Those who voted for him hope. And apprently those who did not vote for him have hope also. Only it is hope he will fail.
The question was never about experience but who the majority of this country thought would do a better job. And even though the Bush legacy has left Obama a lousy hand, the bar has been set so low by the previous administration, experince is not needed. Just application of some common sense.
November 18th, 2008 at 3:00 pm
So, to be President, you don’t need experience, but to be VP you do?
November 18th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Kind of amusing.
Seems that Pres.-elect Obama is surrounding himself with all Clinton era retreads for his “new” administration.
Smart move, considering he has no “experience”.
BUT, the more leftist of his followers are not happy, lol.
November 18th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Boy, you Canadians sound like the better mannered twin of the whiners on the Right here in the US. It just cracks me up.
You guys can try to turn this discussion from Palin to Obama all you want. But the thrust of your initial comments and the point of the post was about Palin. I addressed that.
We will see if experience matters won’t we? As far as I am concerned, since the performance of the last 5 presidents went from underwhelming to awful, and that 4 of them were governors, I do not hold much stock in the experience quotient. Being President requires something not found in any other job. To be a good leader of a country, one must be able to articulate their plan clearly, act upon that plan, have a good team in place to enact the plan and convince the population to they are working for them and not for special intersts or some whacko personal agenda. Experience and experts can be hired.
But all this is moot as I said. You can sit there up in Canada and watch. We will either go to Hell in a handbasket and take many of you with us. Or the new direction will stop the negative movement and all of us will prosper. The what could haves, the what should haves, the mighta beens are now just hindsight. And it is way too early to even know if it is 20/20 hindsight yet.
It does seem odd that my hardest times as a business owner and personally have been while a Republican was President. Yeah, that’s really odd.