Blue Like You

Conservative musings - formerly Joanne’s Journey
June 26th, 2008

Beyond scrutiny: Stephane Dion and the Sun Editorial Board

H/T to Tori for this one…

Is this guy for real?

In a 75-minute session with Sun Media’s editorial board in Toronto, Dion predicted his proposed carbon tax will trigger substantial reductions by 2012, building momentum that he hopes will reach a 20% decrease by 2020. However, he can’t forecast how fast emissions will decrease in the short term.

"I’m confident we will have significant reductions. I’m not telling you specific numbers because you would not trust me," he said.

Okay… and we’re still supposed to take this plan seriously?

And is that another example of the same values that the Liberal party shares with Jennifer Wright’s Green Shift?

Stephane Dion basically wants us to blindly trust him on this one.

We’re to follow him like good little lemmings - right over the cliff.

* * * *

More from the Sun Editorial Board:

With numbers, he’s a greenhorn - Lorrie Goldstein.

Dion Green Shift a Green Shaft - Linda Leatherdale.

Dion gets his shift together - Toronto Sun. (And if you look really hard, you’ll see him concede that his "carbon tax might indirectly lead to higher prices at the pumps. "

* * * *

Jennifer Wright update - From the authentic Green Shift website:

To all who are visiting this site in interest of what is happening to Green Shift, and/or are questioning whether we have a tie to the Liberal Party of Canada, we want to be very clear – our mission is to help the environment, not to get dragged down by political baggage that we cannot control.

The fact that the Liberal Party of Canada has used our name for their environmental plan is, to say the least, extremely upsetting, and damaging to the reputation that we uphold. We sincerely apologize to all of the businesses, institutions and individuals who are a part of the real Green Shift and sincerely hope that you will not suffer from anyone accidently thinking that you have ties to a political agenda…

More at the Green Shift website.

Also, Dr. Roy has a related post - Grit Arrogance.

Oh, and Jennifer Wright, did you know that you were actually o.k. with the Liberals stealing the name of your company?

SDA weighs in here.

50 Responses to “Beyond scrutiny: Stephane Dion and the Sun Editorial Board”

  1. Dion and his “experts” are completely out to lunch on this one.

    As long as fossil fuels remain the most available fuel any increase in their cost will only add to inflation. Increased prices will cause a temporary reduction in usage but as soon as inflation puts the cost of the fuels back in line the usage will increase again. Witness the 1970’s The cost of fuel sky rocketed and everyone stopped driving their huge cars. In short order people were driving even bigger SUVs because the cost of fuel had been brought back into line through inflation. Until we invent another energy source more plentiful and net cost fossil fuels will remain a mainstay of our energy supply. No matter what the taxes.

    Of course the really great thing is that Dion is no where near the levers of power and I am quite certain that he is moving farther away from them every time he opens his mouth.

  2. “I’m confident we will have significant reductions. I’m not telling you specific numbers because you would not trust me,” he said.

    Gee, I wonder why Canadians shoudn’t trust him?

    “And he smiled, straight faced while he lied..”

    ==

  3. Alberta Girl Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 9:59 am

    “In short order people were driving even bigger SUVs because the cost of fuel had been brought back into line through inflation. ”

    I believe another reason for the bigger SUV’s and trucks is because the majority of this country is rural - that is - the vast size means that anyone not living in a city has to negotiate country roads and highways and given that half the year is snow or freezing rain - smart cars just don’t get through those drifts quite like an SUV.

  4. What is wrong with the MSM. Even Lorrie Goldstien , who is generally logical has not asked the pertinent question.

    Here are the CO2 emission by country from a “global warming friendly” source , so one cannot claim the numbers have been “massaged” by “deniers”.

    http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/each-countrys-share-of-co2-emissions.html

    The total CO2 is 5,952,789,000 tons (all countries). Canada is listed as 174,401,000 tons or 2.93% of the total contribution of CO2.

    So if there is such a dire need to impose Dion’s carbon tax to save the earth , and it will achieve 20% reduction , this amounts to reducing Canada’s total contribution to 2.34% from 2.93% and in the process wrecks Canada’s economy.

    … what a wonderful plan !

  5. Dion’s plan would work if God forbid he was elected and implemented the plan. The economy would be devastated, the combination of closed businesses not emitting anything, and millions of additional people on EI not driving to work, he would easily make his reduction targets.

  6. How long does it take new innovations to be everyday needs and wants by the population. If one studies this you will find that it is usually adapted by the generation the invention took place in. As an example let’s take kitchen appliances. A blender for example.
    My generation grew up with the egg beater, or for small jobs, 2 forks, for doing slightly beaten eggs.
    Today the egg beater is a strange contraptions that young brides look at with that -what is this-look.
    Until our kids start giving us these new things for gifts, we ignore them. I remember giving my mother-in-law an electric fry pan, and it stayed in the box for about 3 yrs. My kids have given me several types of blenders and I still grab 2 forks, as they are easier to wash than take a blender apart. (hey,maybe I’m green and saving water.) Just because new technology will make electric cars available does not mean everyone will rush out and buy one. Need, money, age, habits and so many other things will make our decisions. Habits are hard to change, and for some reason our kids end up buying the same brands of everyday items their parent’s bought. The above might be a weird example, but the message is the same.
    If you stop and think you could come up with your own examples of how long it took you to get the latest gadget, t.v., or whatever.
    Back to the forks, making french toast for breakfast.

  7. No lemmings shall take us alive!!!

    Trust him???? Who’s he kidding….he had a chance when he was Enviro. Minister to decrease emissions and look what happened….they increased on his watch.

    Trust him???? Of course not.

    What’s interesting this morning are reports that McGuinty has now accepted Dion’s carbon tax plan..but, wasn’t it just last week that Dalton didn’t like it?

    I guess the whole idea of screwing Canadians over with a tax on everything appeals to McGuinty.

    McGuinty’s not doing Dion any favours in the trust on promises kept front either.

    Perhaps Dalton’s itching to push the lead lemming off his cliff?

  8. machiavelli Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 10:47 am

    Is a 20% deduction by 2020 worth de-industrializing the economy back to the Middle Ages?

    Both Dion’s carbon tax increase and Harper’s Cap-&-Trade tax increase will mean that Canadians will have a standard of living equal to the standards of the Middle Ages.

    Both of these enormous tax increases, and their flow through price increases to all consumer products, will diminish our standard of living since we will not be in a position to make as many purchases , thus causing massive unemployment and recession. This is already beginning in the auto industry, with much more to come if either of Mr. Dion’s, or Mr. Harper’s major tax increases are implemented.

    Both of these socialist style tax grabs are calculated to redistribute wealth from wealth creators to others.

  9. And we’re supposed to trust him more without him telling us the numbers?? Who is advising this clown??

  10. most CO2 “pollution”, to use the eviro-twits word, is natural, what does Diondipskick plan to do about that? Assuming he beleives that CO2 is the main culprit in changing climate then logically something has to be done about the naturally occuring CO2 which on a percentage basis outnumbers the man made stuff by a factor of about 32:1, unless he also beleives that man made CO2 has some kind of special magical heat trapping power; just wondering

  11. Someone should point out to Dion he is a carbon based life form

  12. paulsstuff Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 11:28 am

    My question to Dion would be this.Are you prepared to put this plan to a vote, and if yes, will more than 11 Liberal MP’s show up to vote?

  13. philanthropist Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Dion doesn’t know how deep the economic depression caused by his policies would be, so he’s not being disengenuous about that, at least it shows he appreciates the economic devastation he wants to cause before he leaves for France.

  14. So Dion low balls the expectations of his own plan. Nice “leader”.

  15. paulsstuff Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    Anyone else find it’s odd there are no polls out showing party support since the big greenshaft announcement?

  16. What boggles my mind is that why anyone would buy into this scam. Why in the heck are there ANY supporters period? I pray that Canadians are not so stupid to believe that they will profit while helping the planet.

  17. Alberta GIrl Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

    “Anyone else find it’s odd there are no polls out showing party support since the big greenshaft announcement?”

    I was thinking that very thing…..they are most likely too busy trying to come up with the right question to get the right answer!

  18. Paulstuff I find it odd too. I suspect that maybe that some polling firms have and it’s really bad for the Liberals so they just suppressed them knowing it would be embarrassing. That’s my two cents anyway.

  19. Check out the real Green Shift site. I think Jennifer’s updated it!

  20. I think most of us are for the reduction in pollution. The problem is idiots have interchanged the words pollution to mean emmission or global warming or climate change. Pollution is dumping raw sewage into the ocean, and killing the fish.
    OT, now on cbc, Chretain has been vindicated for any involvement of the scandal.

  21. I was thinking that very thing…..they are most likely too busy trying to come up with the right question to get the right answer!

    Gee Alberta Girl, you couldn’t possibly be referring to the poll on the Green Shift where they had to explain the question to those being polled?

    As in, “If this happens and then this happens just before this happens, and if we all do this and everyone else does that…”

    It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad….

    -

  22. The line from the baseball movie was ‘if you build it, they will come’. For industry the line is ‘if you tax it, they will leave’. The hold on manufacturing companies here is tenuous at best without any stupid new tax. The rising dollar has already shown how fragile most companies are, and how quickly production can be shifted elsewhere. Hey, maybe thats what Dion means by the green shift. He will force carbon emitters in Canada to shift their production to Mexico, India and China, where there are no environmental standards, and global emissions will increase due to the lower levels of technology used. Makes perfect liberal sense to me.

  23. And the rats are leaving the Titanic..see link at Bourque re Iggy’s executive assistant.He’s quit Iggy and gone to the Dominion Institute.I’m sure there will be more to follow.BTW,check out the link to NDP’s site re Dion and the 4 seasons,and Dion’s excuses not to bring down the Gov’t.

  24. lemmings Sammy….lemmings not rats.

  25. “Anyone else find it’s odd there are no polls out showing party support since the big greenshaft announcement?”

    Like this one?

    http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/31078/grits_gain_conservatives_lead_in_canada/

    And if you go to Far and Wide you will see Steve has broken this down for you.

  26. so in other words, no real change

  27. Waiting for Gayle’s standard answer…”..but this is different!”

  28. and these were on the link, too…

    Approval Ratings: Harper 32%, Dion 12%

    Preferred Prime Minister: Harper 37%, Dion 10%, Neither 39%

    Momentum Score: Harper -19, Dion -26

    52% do not want the opposition to force an early election

    Harper defeats Dion on eight qualities and characteristics

    dunno what a momentum score is, and have no idea of the 8 qualities that haper beats dion on, tho

  29. Pretty simple really,,only the ones who beleive in the carbon tax pay for it.Something like a school tax .(Everyone pays for it,even those with no kids).only in the reverse.Just put a square on the tax return for the carbon tax lovers.Bet Dion wont get $15 billion from the Lib voters.Bet he wont get $1 million.The guy is a joke,just ignore him.Oh we cant,he comes on the front page of his friendly newspapers every day and is on CBC and CTV everynight,i wonder why he is so popular with these guys.He must be smart eh like Don Newman!Or is it to show Canadians what an idiot looks & sounds like.You know like a scare tactic.

  30. My daily duty is to go to Jason’s site and vote in the Angus Reid poll, at the top-Will Stephane Dion be next PM-75% say NO.

  31. we don’t need a tax on everything….plain and simple.

  32. I say we make it like the Wheat Board. Only those east of Manitoba can belong to the carbon tax board.

  33. “Waiting for Gayle’s standard answer…”..but this is different!””

    People wondered about a poll, I provide a link to a poll, and this is the response.

    Perhaps I missed the part of my post when I suggested this poll is good news for the liberals…

    Oh, that’s right. I did not say anything about the poll itself.

  34. Nothing on pollution or conservation in Dion plan. But hey Dion is going to save the world by brining in a tax. We can’t even fix are health care system but Dion is going to change the weather by a tax. WTF!! who falls for thi crap.

    Anyway tis is my feelings on saving the planet. RIP Mr. Carlin

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw&feature=related

  35. MaryT says

    “I think most of us are for the reduction in pollution. The problem is idiots have interchanged the words pollution to mean emmission or global warming or climate change.”

    Preech. You are bang on with that comment.

  36. I’ve just been watching the local news where they’re talking about the high cost of gas affecting so many areas - from school busing to Meals on Wheels to to taxi fares… The list goes on and on.

    Add to that a carbon tax, and people will really be in trouble. And McGuinty is in favour of it now? With all the coal plants still in operation? I really don’t get that. The cost of electricity is going to escalate as it is, and then if there’s a carbon tax on top of it, who’s gonna pay?

    You guessed it. The lemming staring at you in the mirror.

  37. For those parents out there,you will for sure be seeing fewer school field trips. School fees will go up because of the high cost of energy that they will have no choice to pass it on somehow. You have to have power and heating in a school especially in the winter.

    Where do non-profit charities like shelters fit in to the carbon tax grab? What about food banks? They will get fewer donations because fewer people will be able to afford to donate at the same time more people will have to depend on them. BTW, where has food bank Gerard Kennedy been hiding out lately?

    Anyone who votes for this needs to have their heads examined.

  38. paulsstuff Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    The local paper here estimates every penny added to a litre of gas costs the town $13,000. Dion’s plan is estimated to add 10 cents a litre by year 4 from the tax trickling down. Can you say property tax increase?

    Here in Ajax, the local hospital is laying off 85 nurses, closing beds, etc. due to budget difficulties. and a carbon-tax on their utilities is going to make it better?

    Snow plowing, garbage pick-up, recycling, meals on wheels, infrastructure repairs, among other things are all going to cost more. I wonder if Dion realizes what all those street lights use for power.

    My girlfriend and I go to Algonquin Park every year for a week camping. Normally you had to book by April to get a spot in July. I phoned today asking if a particular spot on the water was available by any chance. The guy laughed and said I could pretty much have any spot. Nobody is going this year.

    I wonder if Dion even has half a clue that most northern communities in Ontario depend on tourism in order for the towns and businesses to survive.

  39. And then the big question: How much would it cost to administer this nightmare? Where’s that money coming from? Does it come off the top before anything gets rebated to taxpayers?

    Seriously, who does he think he’s kidding?

  40. Hey! What did the Sun Girl have to say about it?

  41. Hey, this wouldn’t be a totally partisan view on this site by any chance? LOL

    Sun - editorial review - a total “Conservative” newspaper…..uh huh

  42. today’s wise words from dion:

    “TORONTO — Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion says 40 per cent of Canada’s carbon emissions come from Alberta and Saskatchewan and the two western provinces will have to do the most to change their habits under his new green plan. But he said it will be good for them - and he’s taking that message to the Calgary Stampede next weekend.”

    “”To do the right thing will be beneficial for them,” Mr. Dion told The Globe and Mail’s editorial board. “I care about Alberta and Saskatchewan. I know many people who want to do the right thing. Many will know that it will create jobs there - green jobs”

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080627.wdion27/BNStory/National/home

  43. today’s wise words from dion:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080627.wdion27/BNStory/National/home

    “TORONTO — Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion says 40 per cent of Canada’s carbon emissions come from Alberta and Saskatchewan and the two western provinces will have to do the most to change their habits under his new green plan. But he said it will be good for them - and he’s taking that message to the Calgary Stampede next weekend.”

    and to the ones above…can you tell me what the reduction targets are in dion’s carbon tax?

  44. Tori, thanks for those links.

    More Liberal arrogance.

  45. sorry about the double post…my connection is flaky this morning

  46. Not a problem. (For me, that is. Sorry for you about your connection.)

    ;)

  47. What is a green job. Yes, AB and SASK do want to do the right thing, and that just might be to separate.

  48. paulsstuff Says:
    June 27th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    “and to the ones above…can you tell me what the reduction targets are in dion’s carbon tax?”

    No we can’t. Dion says he won’t tell us because we don’t trust him.

  49. [...] - as if that will somehow explain the holes in his platform. (Or else he tells reporters that he’s not talking numbers because they wouldn’t trust him anyway!) He refuses to even consider the possibility that Canadians will not warm up to it: …Asked [...]

  50. [...] As Raphael points out, Stephane Dion is having great trouble providing details to his plan. He stumbles when asked pointed questions and refers inquirers to the website or grandchildren who are presumably brighter than the person asking the question. And he won’t tell us specific numbers, because we wouldn’t trust him anyway, right? [...]

Leave a Reply