Skip to content
Archive of entries posted on 9th June 2008

C-484 will protect woman who want to keep their babies

I couldn’t sign off for the night without mentioning this great letter in today’s StarA woman’s right to have a baby. This was in response to Antonia Zerbisias’ rant from a few days ago.

Anyway, Sarah Sonne of Vanier, Ontario writes:

In defending "women’s rights," Antonia Zerbisias is actually limiting choices for women. To say that Bill C-484 is anti-woman and anti-choice, or that "women’s interests are not paramount," is illogical and unfounded. Bill C-484 was created specifically to support women’s interests in the protection of their unborn children. The act states, "This section does not apply in respect of conduct relating to the lawful termination of the pregnancy of the mother of the child to which the mother has consented."

The bill is not about abortion. It simply states that when a mother has chosen to carry her child to full term, the law supports that choice and will not allow someone to take that freedom away from her without consequences. We’re not talking about a return to "coat hangers and knitting needles" here; we’re talking about weapons being used to take a pregnancy away from a woman by force.

Bill C-484 does not change the definition of a human being, nor does it take any choice or rights away from women. It empowers a woman’s choice to reproduce and it sends a clear message that violence against pregnant women is wrong by addressing the very thing that defines a pregnancy – her fetus.

The bill attempts to empower a victim of violence by validating her choices and freedom, yet it appears that its critics are concerned with everyone whom it does not apply to.

Find a woman whose pregnancy has ended because of violence and ask her how she feels.

Really, there are only two ways a fetus might die other than via a miscarriage or a legal abortion. That would either by as a result of a violent act perpetrated upon the mother, or else in the case of a fetus being deliberately targeted and the mother survives but her baby does not.

The latter situation could be easily seen as a forced abortion. If a woman’s right to choose is paramount in this society, then Bill C-484 should be supported by all Pro-Choicers.

A woman’s right to choose cannot only be protected when she doesn’t want the pregnancy to continue. That would be discriminatory.

* * * *

Update: Dr. Roy has posted a YouTube video by Sarah. Well done!

Post - Don’t be frightened by fetus crime bill, Tory MP says.

Sour Grapes

I had updated my previous post with the awesome news that the HNIC Theme will now be owned by CTV , and thought that was enough to mark this momentous occasion.

However, after having read CBC’s take on things , I feel that the event is separate post-worthy.

…CBC Sports executive director Scott Moore said he was disappointed but not surprised the song was shopped elsewhere…

…Moore said he was surprised a rival network would purchase something so inextricably linked the Hockey Night brand.

"It’s a constant commercial for our network," he said…

Uh, yeah. A constant commercial for the incompetence of the Mothercorps.

I only feel sorry for Don Cherry. Perhaps he should follow the song to its new home.

* * * *

Update: Check out MDL here around the 4:15 mark!!

Oops! Looks like Stompin’ Tom might save the day! I wonder how much that one’s going to cost us?

* * * *

Tuesday Update : SDA BWWAAHAAAA!!!

The RecordCTV power play nets rights to former CBC hockey anthem. Clever headline.

Edmonton Journal – Hockey’s bone-headed play of the year.

* * * *

Wednesday Update : DO NOT MISS THIS ONE!!! Cobert on Hockey Night in Canada via Darryl Wolk.

Her Majesty’s Reeking Official Opposition

Is it possible that Parliament’s passage of C-16 was actually a calculated risk by the Harper government designed to expose the weakness of the Official Opposition? The risk of course is two-fold: That this Government could be taken down at a moment in time that would not be of their liking, and of course there is the undeniable fact that the CPC could be put in the same awkward situation when they are someday back on the other side of the House (although I hope that never happens).

However, right now it is working to the advantage of the Conservative government. Stephane Dion is increasingly cast in the role of a stumbling, bumbling fool who can’t make up his mind what to do one day, and then the next he is painted as stubbornly resisting the sage advice of others who are eager to actually do what they were sent to Ottawa to do, which is to vote and be counted.

This has generated an internal struggle and lack of solidarity that is becoming increasingly difficult to contain. Even Lawrence Martin , the Globe’s resident Liberal apologist is starting to have problems defending the party. He even points out that although Ralph Goodale is a "good chap," he "reeks of old politics" and "needs a new assignment."

Yikes! Talk about tough love!!

Now the Conservatives and NDP are planning to expose the Liberals’ lack of accountability to their constituents, by targeting the no-shows. (Does anyone have a list of House of Commons votes and who didn’t show up?)

Clearly there are some influential Liberal caucus members who are sick and tired of sitting on their hands and having to defend their hypocritical position, when they rail against the government one day, and then refuse it bring it down the next.

They include, but are not limited to Bob Rae, Michael Ignatieff, Ralph Goodale, Karen Redman, John McCallum, and Dominic LeBlanc.

One thing for sure – The longer the Liberals say one thing but do another, the more they will be taunted by the other parties for their hypocrisy.

And contrary to Ralph Goodale’s assessment of the other two opposition parties, the NDP’s plan to poke the LPC on this one will yield results far greater than "the square root of nothing."

* * * *

Afternoon Update : Liberals show divisions on timing of Carbon Tax Plan – CTV.

Steve JankeThe Carbon Tax Grab: Garth Turner blinks.

Well, my hunch is that Garth is very hot for an election, and the perfect timing for said election will occur precisely at the moment that his Red Messiah delivers the sermon from the Hill.

Evening Update: Warren Kinsella was on MDL advising Dion to defer the Carbon Tax plan, and go for an election now. Another interesting item was his (dare I say) admiration of the CPC’s clever use of earned media.

Also, via Calgary Grit we have this Globe link with an intriguing line: …Later, one Conservative official laughed, saying the Liberals “took the bait.”

CTVHouse passes controversial immigration reforms:

With several Liberals abstaining, the House of Commons has approved controversial Conservative reforms to Canada’s immigration laws by a vote of 121-90…

I want the stats for that one!

* * * *

Tuesday Update: Please watch this awesome video (Slacker’s Unite!) by Hunter at Climbing out of the Dark, showing your tax dollars hard at work!!!

And via Diogenes Borealis, we have this gem from the OLO:

Dion again asserted yesterday that he didn’t want to provoke a July election and said, as he did last week, that he didn’t think July was the right month to seize his chance because it’s "the only month of the year with sun and heat."

I think I need a T-shirt.