I couldn’t sign off for the night without mentioning this great letter in today’s Star – A woman’s right to have a baby. This was in response to Antonia Zerbisias’ rant from a few days ago.
Anyway, Sarah Sonne of Vanier, Ontario writes:
In defending "women’s rights," Antonia Zerbisias is actually limiting choices for women. To say that Bill C-484 is anti-woman and anti-choice, or that "women’s interests are not paramount," is illogical and unfounded. Bill C-484 was created specifically to support women’s interests in the protection of their unborn children. The act states, "This section does not apply in respect of conduct relating to the lawful termination of the pregnancy of the mother of the child to which the mother has consented."
The bill is not about abortion. It simply states that when a mother has chosen to carry her child to full term, the law supports that choice and will not allow someone to take that freedom away from her without consequences. We’re not talking about a return to "coat hangers and knitting needles" here; we’re talking about weapons being used to take a pregnancy away from a woman by force.
Bill C-484 does not change the definition of a human being, nor does it take any choice or rights away from women. It empowers a woman’s choice to reproduce and it sends a clear message that violence against pregnant women is wrong by addressing the very thing that defines a pregnancy – her fetus.
The bill attempts to empower a victim of violence by validating her choices and freedom, yet it appears that its critics are concerned with everyone whom it does not apply to.
Find a woman whose pregnancy has ended because of violence and ask her how she feels.
Really, there are only two ways a fetus might die other than via a miscarriage or a legal abortion. That would either by as a result of a violent act perpetrated upon the mother, or else in the case of a fetus being deliberately targeted and the mother survives but her baby does not.
The latter situation could be easily seen as a forced abortion. If a woman’s right to choose is paramount in this society, then Bill C-484 should be supported by all Pro-Choicers.
A woman’s right to choose cannot only be protected when she doesn’t want the pregnancy to continue. That would be discriminatory.
* * * *
Update: Dr. Roy has posted a YouTube video by Sarah. Well done!
Post - Don’t be frightened by fetus crime bill, Tory MP says.

