Blue Like You

Conservative musings - formerly Joanne’s Journey

Archive for November 22nd, 2007

Protecting the right to choose - for ALL women

Thursday, November 22nd, 2007

Let’s hope Ken Epp has a bit more success than Leon Benoit getting some legislation through to protect Unborn Victims of Crime and their mothers who have chosen to follow through with the pregnancy.

I think there is a lot of grassroots support out there for this bill. Ironically, it was the Conservative government itself that squashed Benoit’s efforts. Perhaps it was afraid of a pro-choice backlash, but I firmly believe this is not a mutually exclusive initiative. With the right wording, I think the law can protect a woman’s right to choose whether she decides to abort her pregnancy or not. If she chooses to give birth to her baby and someone then commits an act of violence to destroy her unborn child, there should be a punishment for that.

Whatever your political stripes, please contact your MP and let him or her know that you support Bill C-484 (Unborn Victim of Crimes Act).

It’s the least we can do for these grieving families.

They deserve closure.

* * * *
Background: Check out Suzanne’s post - Margaret Somerville: Defending fetal homicide laws. There are great links to previous arguments both pro & con.

Update: Red Tory has a problem with the bill.

Why am I not surprised?

Upperdate: Red actually makes a good point. *Shudder*

* * * *
Unambig - In the case of fetal rights and interference.

Nexus - I just love it when he gets all dishonest like that

* * * *
Lifesite: “…some of the families of women who were victims of deadly violent crime while pregnant are urging Canadians to immediately contact their Members of Parliament to urge them to support the Unborn Victims of Crime Act - Bill C-484.”

Saturday Update: Rootleweb - Unborn Victims of Crime Act.

Stand your Ground - Unborn Victims of Crime Bill to be Reintroduced.

On the website is a pic of a fetus and a toddler, with the following motto:


“A future child? NO! It’s a CHILD with a FUTURE!”

Small man; small minds

Thursday, November 22nd, 2007

Continuing the ‘Small man’ spat (which is really quite hilarious when you consider the relative size of Dalton McGuinty vs. Peter Van Loan) . . .

Brother David’s compatriots are now rushing to little Dalton’s defence. That big bully Van Loan should apologize, according to Stephane Dion. Never mind that the LPC would benefit enormously from any increase in seats in the land of Lemmingville, so his actions are hardly altruistic.

The Post article quotes Dion as saying, “Premier McGuinty is taking his job seriously, and representing the people of Ontario … The ridiculous comments made by Minister Van Loan are contemptible at best, and disrespectful of the office that Mr. McGuinty was recently reelected to hold.”

Yet it is perfectly fine for Stephane Dion to call the Prime Minister ‘pathetic’, and infer that he is a liar, thereby disrespecting the highest political office in our country:

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is pathetic. Court documents show that he misled the House. Court documents told the truth, not the Prime Minister

But of course, that is Liberal entitlement.

Meanwhile, Dalton McGuinty tries to keep his hands clean. Other people do his dirty work for him.

He will rise above all this name-calling:

At Queen’s Park, McGuinty insisted he had no interest in a petty squabble with Van Loan and warned that Ottawa should look at the bigger picture. “Why is it that whenever we Torontonians Ontarians stand up for ourselves we’re accused of being un-Canadian?” he said.

As John Stossel would say, ‘Give me a break!’