Skip to content

The Economy Premier?

Not content to merely be known as the ‘Education Premier’, Dalton McGuinty has now taken to giving advice to the Bank of CanadaOntario premier urges Bank of Canada not to hike interest rate.

He actually has the gall to talk about the need for ‘prudence’(!):

“It points to the need for continuing prudence,” he said.

“Try as we might, we cannot completely uncouple ourselves from the American economy. They’re our single largest trading partner and consumer confidence — American consumer confidence — is a powerful factor in determining the health and vitality of our own economy here.”

McGuinty made the remarks from a Toronto elementary school where he was promoting a new expense for Ontario: full-day kindergarten for four- and five-year-olds.

The self-described education premier announced plans last fall to forge ahead with the costly project despite the economic downturn and warnings of a record-setting deficit.

The program, which is expected to cost $1.5 billion a year once fully implemented, is being slowly phased in over five years, starting with 600 schools this fall.

Ontario is also seeing higher inflation than other provinces, largely due to the July 1 implementation of the new harmonized sales tax.

Consumer prices in Ontario rose 2.9 per cent in July — the largest year-over-year hike among the provinces — with the HST accounting for about 1.3 per cent of that increase. Canada’s annual inflation rate rose by eight-tenths of a point to 1.8 per cent, according to Statistics Canada…

Is it possible that Dalton McGuinty is finally beginning to wake up to the possible nightmarish consequences of his many disastrous policies?

Nah, he’s just hoping he can get away with it.

The audacity of a free pass

Again I have to ask myself how we got to this position of allowing sovereignists like Bloc MP Carole Lavallée feast at the Federal trough while she indignantly criticizes PM Harper’s attempt to encourage Quebec students to visit Canada’s National Parks?  [Google translation]

According to Lavallée, that is propaganda!

As with the refugee quagmire, only in Canada would such self-destructive behaviour be tolerated – all in the name of ‘rights’ and  ‘freedoms’.

WE THE PEOPLE must take a stand

Mary T nailed it when she mused that it’s rather hypocritical of Iggy to say ‘we make the rules‘, and then force his democratically-elected caucus members to vote the way he wants, rather than according their constituents’ wishes on the subject of the Long-Gun Registry.

What with this and the Liberal obsession about the long-form census, they seem to be evolving into the Party of Bureaucratic Coercion and Enforcement.

I’m with Prairie Tory on this one, wondering what’s their game-plan?

This dog won’t hunt – except among Big City and Top-Cop elitists and irate public sector unions.

*   *   *   *

Worth Reading:

More from Tom Brodbeck at Raise a Little Hell.

Why the Gun Registry Needs To GoGarry Breitkreuz

Freedom is our Achilles Heel

I find it bitterly ironic that one of our most cherished gifts in a democracy like Canada is also the means whereby we risk losing it.

We have fought  many battles and lost our sons and daughters to protect our freedom and yet it is being used against us in a war from within.

The grooming of extremists within our own borders exploits that fear we all have of appearing to be ‘racist’ or ‘intolerant’.  After all we are nice Canadians and everyone gets along here, right?  If anyone breaks the rules it is only because they had a bad childhood.  Nobody is bad. There are only victims.

And above all we must never question that infallible Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

This willful blindness will be our downfall if we don’t deal with it head-on.

Namby-pamby politicians are too afraid of losing votes to get a spine on this issue, so it is up to individual citizens to let their voices be heard with letters and emails to local newspapers and their elected representatives urging vigilance when it comes to our safety.   Many in the Muslim community and outside are asking Canadian Imams to do the right thing and publicly condemn extremism and acts of terror.

Sadly, some like Scarborough Imam Aly Hindy minimize the danger:

But Scarborough imam Aly Hindy — who still believes too many people were rounded up the Toronto 18 case, and most meant no harm to Canadians — derides the “so-called war against terrorism,” suggesting the threat is largely exaggerated.

“We don’t have this feeling of any danger. We feel very safe,” he said.

I’m sure he does.

But as David Harris says, This is our future.  This threat is not going to go away.

It’s time to remove the blinders and deal with these problems before our political correctness kills us.

*   *   *   *

Update

In a Bangkok apartment, Tamils wait for a ship to CanadaGlobe (H/T Sammy and Jad):

“I would like to go to Canada like the others, but it’s expensive,” said Suhumar, a 23-year-old who fled the final stages of Sri Lanka’s civil war 16 months ago after his father disappeared and he was briefly jailed.

Suhumar, who is officially registered in Bangkok with the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, said agents operating in the Thai capital and offering safe passage to Canada are charging tens of thousands of dollars. “How,” he said, “can an ordinary refugee afford this?”

Indeed.  And that is only one of the many elephants in the room.

*   *   *   *

Tuesday Update

The right messageNational Post:

According to the imams, this is the first time any national Islamic council has so forcefully and succinctly stated its opposition to killing in the name of Allah. Signed by nearly 50 prominent imams, the declaration was read out at hundreds of mosques across the country on the first Friday Sabbath of Ramadan.

More please.

ABP gaining traction?

Is the ‘Anyone But’ Party going to be the big winner at the Ontario municipal and provincial level?  And if so, how would that impact the next Federal election?

While driving home yesterday afternoon we happened to tune into AM 640 and Arlene Bynon’s program was centering on these questions – especially the first.

Lorrie Goldstein was interviewed on the subject and has a column in this morning’s Sun outlining the effect of the arrogant lefties’ assaults on Rob Ford – it is causing support to increase for Ford’s more fiscally conservative stance.  The tax and spend mentality of the NDPers in Toronto may have finally hit the wall of voters’ tolerance, especially in the outlying ‘burbs.

Christina Blizzard picks up this theme and extrapolates it to the Ontario Liberal government which is now the status quo and becoming increasingly arrogant and out-of-touch with the taxpayer.  The 2011 election may see a backlash there.  In fact it has already started:

…For the first time since he was re-elected in 2007, Dalton McGuinty is trailing the PC leader in the polls.

Ipsos figures show the PCs at 36%, have a narrow lead over the Liberals, at 35%.

The NDP is at 18% and Greens are at 11%.

Sure, a slim 1% margin hardly makes Tory Tim Hudak a shoo-in for the premier, but it gives the Tories a needed boost.

That figure isn’t the most important one. On every question, the Tories were ahead. A whopping 64% of those polled want a change in government.

What’s most surprising about the figures is that Hudak is largely unknown. It’s not so much Hudak they’re voting for as it is McGuinty they’re voting against.

They want anyone but him…

So if voter intention is moving against the status quo in Toronto and Ontario, what about the federal scene? Are the incumbent Tories in trouble?

My guess is not, because of the minority situation where the Government’s hands are bound by the 3 opposition parties and the constant threat of an election. So federally the fact is that the status quo is still the tax & spend mentality because a more fiscally-responsible position would be trashed by the left.

Therefore I think that if the Harper Conservatives could put forth a vision of Canada that would safeguard our economy, our communities and our borders, and restore respect to the taxpayer, then a majority is a realistic possibility – especially if it builds on the anyone-but-lefties momentum.

*   *   *   *

Related

Iggy to Harper: “We make the rules!”David Akin (Great truth-ad fodder for the next election!)

And how about this from the same source?

The Conservatives, for the last three years, have raised twice as much money from twice as many people as all the other parties, including the Liberals, combined.

“Politics is not a spectator sport,” Ignatieff told the crowd here. “We need your help. We are up against the toughest political machine, the nastiest political machine in the history of Canadian politics.”

So any grass root supporters donating to the Conservative Party are enabling the nastiest political machine in the history of Canadian politics, according to Michael Ignatieff. Don’t you feel ashamed of yourselves?

I’m sure that Maria Augimeri would not be impressed with your progress on the ‘learning curve’ either.

Savouring the summer

Planning to take the next week or so off from blogging.

As always, please check out Blogging Tories and don’t forget the Forum sidebar with lively discussions on various topics.

Goldstein on the Tamil migrants

Lorrie Goldstein is back from vacation and weighing in on the Tamil boat situation (Bizarre Tamil argument doesn’t fly).  I had been hoping he would address this immediately upon his return because his columns during the Tamil Gardiner incident in May of 2009  seemed to be on the side of the protesters, and so I was curious to see his reaction to the current story.

You may recall that he had called people ‘racist’ who were condemning the action and suggesting that the protesters go ‘back home’.

However today he is criticizing the Globe column by Waldman and Macklin which I had instantly dismissed as airy-fairy leftwing clattertrap myself upon first reading.  Their naive POV is essentially that it is Canada’s duty to accept any and all refugees, and the system will eventually weed out the terrorists and bad guys.

Lorrie notes that the most outrageous  argument is that Canada is somehow responsible for solving the problems in the rest of the world and then eventually the flood will dry up to a trickle:

But arguing the “only” way we can stop these ships is by solving the aftermath of the bloody, 26-year civil war between the Sri Lankan government and the Tamil Tigers, in which ordinary Tamils and Sinhalese were victims, is a red herring.

Further, regardless of whether some future Parliament may decide to stop these vessels before reaching Canada, the permanent answer is to fix our refugee system, which is a complete mess.

On this point, Waldman and Macklin absurdly suggest the status quo is working.

Goldstein points out evidence to the contrary:

In the real world, as federal Auditor General Sheila Fraser found in her 2008 annual report, Canada’s Border Services Agency had lost track of 41,000 illegal immigrants ordered deported, most of them failed refugee claimants, hundreds of them criminals and terrorists.

Lorrie rightly asks why immigrants would bother with the complicated legal processes when there seems to be so little deterrence for illegal entry?

But how to square this circle with his earlier columns?

Lorrie reminds us that refugee policy shouldn’t be ‘made up ‘on the fly, especially not fuelled by racist attitudes implying all Tamils are terrorists, held by some in Canada.

And that is where we need to be careful.

For as angry as we are that our system seems broken and open to abuse, we need to remember that blanket derogatory references to groups of people can be hurtful and unfair.

But effectively weeding out the criminals, terrorists, and just plain cheaters is going to be one of our biggest challenges moving forward – for the sake of all our law-abiding citizens.

Oh, and welcome back Lorrie!

*   *   *   *

Related

Canadian ‘compassion’ can be deadlyBrian Lilley (I highly recommend reading the whole column):

The last boat in October was the test run and the country failed miserably. While all the passengers were initially detained to determine if there were terrorist members of the Tamil Tigers on board, they were eventually all freed.

That doesn’t mean they were all innocent.

The final passengers were freed on the orders of the Immigration and Refugee Board which rejected government claims and expert witness testimony that some passengers, perhaps as many as 25 had connections to the banned terrorist group.

In February, a Federal Court judge took the IRB to task for the release of one passenger in particular, saying the immigration judge should not have overruled the immigration minister.

And this is interesting – Migrant ‘trend’ must end: Harper:

Indeed earlier this summer, the UN released a report that said: “Given the cessation of hostilities, Sri Lankans originating from the north of the country are no longer in need of international protection under broader refugee criteria or complementary forms of protection solely on the basis of risk of indiscriminate harm.”

Tamil refugee tab could hit millions – Sun:

The claimants will be eligible for work permits, welfare payments, partial health and dental coverage, and subsidized housing while their claims are being heard, Toronto lawyers said.

Hey, how about dental coverage for Canadian seniors?

Another MUST-READ by L. Ian MacDonald in today’s Gazette – Tamil refugee claimants taking advantage of us:

Because they are refugee claimants, they are accorded the same treatment as landed immigrants, and can invoke all the privileges of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is pursuant to a Supreme Court ruling in 1985. There is actually something the government can do about this, as Ezra Levant noted elsewhere yesterday, and that would be to invoke the constitutional override of the notwithstanding clause of the Charter setting the judgment aside for five years.

This is something Ottawa has never done. But as those who were present at the creation of the Charter, including Peter Lougheed, have attested, the notwithstanding clause was the dealmaker, and there would have been no Charter without it.

David Warren’s column is very good too – Head over heart.

A hulk of a question: What to do with Sun Sea? Jack Knox, Times Colonist:

The thing is, the laws aren’t really built to dissuade large-scale migrant-hauling operations where the profit dwarfs the value of the seized boats — and if rumours of the 492 Tamils paying $40,000 or $50,000 a head are true, that’s a human cargo worth $20 million or so.

*   *   *   *

Thursday Update

Captain of Sun Sea has links to Tigers: Newspaper – Province:

...Public Safety Minister Vic Toews has said the Thai cargo ship was part of a “broader criminal enterprise” and a “test boat” intended to gauge Ottawa’s attitude toward refugees arriving by ship.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper echoed those words Tuesday by stating that Ottawa “will not hesitate to strengthen the laws” in order to tackle the “trend” of would-be refugees arriving via human-smuggling ships.

A more forthcoming source has been the Malay Mail newspaper, which reported this week that the commander of the Sun Sea is a man known as Capt. Vinod, who studied at the Malaysian Maritime Academy in Malacca during its early days.

While in Malaysia, Vinod stayed in close contact with local financiers of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), or Tamil Tigers, Singapore-based terrorism expert Prof. Rohan Gunaratna told the newspaper…

With friends like the UN, who needs enemies? – Toronto Sun Editorial

Why is Moon blind to West exporting terrorism? Part II – LankaWeb

Canada: End refugee free-for-all – Ozzie Saffa (Interesting Australian POV, with a link to Ezra’s column)

Identifying captain, crew of Tamil ship could be difficult, expert says – Gazette